PURPOSE: Most radical radiotherapy (RT) candidates with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have Stage III disease and ultimately die with distant metastases. We tested the hypothesis that positron emission tomography (PET) using 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) would detect more unsuspected metastases in apparent Stage III disease than in Stages I-II. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Staging FDG-PET was performed for 167 NSCLC patients, with Stage I-III by conventional workup, who were candidates for curative therapy with surgery (n = 8), radical chemo/RT or RT (n = 156), or preoperative chemo/RT (n = 3). Each patient was allocated a conventional "pre-PET stage" and a "post-PET stage" that relied on PET when discordance with conventional staging occurred. RESULTS: Stage distribution pre-PET was n = 39 (Stage I), n = 28 (Stage II), and n = 100 (Stage III). In 32 patients (19%), PET detected distant metastasis, most commonly abdominal with 17 cases (adrenal, n = 7; liver, n = 4; other, n = 6). Other sites included lung (n = 10) and bone (n = 6). PET-detected metastasis increased with increasing pre-PET stage from I (7.5%) through II (18%) to III (24%, p = 0.016), and, in particular, was significantly higher in Stage III (p = 0.039). Biopsy confirmation was not routine, but progression occurred at PET-detected metastatic sites or other metastatic sites in all but 3 of the 32 patients by last review. CONCLUSION: PET staging is recommended for radical RT candidates with NSCLC. The highest yield of unexpected distant metastases is observed in Stage III.
PURPOSE: Most radical radiotherapy (RT) candidates with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have Stage III disease and ultimately die with distant metastases. We tested the hypothesis that positron emission tomography (PET) using 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) would detect more unsuspected metastases in apparent Stage III disease than in Stages I-II. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Staging FDG-PET was performed for 167 NSCLCpatients, with Stage I-III by conventional workup, who were candidates for curative therapy with surgery (n = 8), radical chemo/RT or RT (n = 156), or preoperative chemo/RT (n = 3). Each patient was allocated a conventional "pre-PET stage" and a "post-PET stage" that relied on PET when discordance with conventional staging occurred. RESULTS: Stage distribution pre-PET was n = 39 (Stage I), n = 28 (Stage II), and n = 100 (Stage III). In 32 patients (19%), PET detected distant metastasis, most commonly abdominal with 17 cases (adrenal, n = 7; liver, n = 4; other, n = 6). Other sites included lung (n = 10) and bone (n = 6). PET-detected metastasis increased with increasing pre-PET stage from I (7.5%) through II (18%) to III (24%, p = 0.016), and, in particular, was significantly higher in Stage III (p = 0.039). Biopsy confirmation was not routine, but progression occurred at PET-detected metastatic sites or other metastatic sites in all but 3 of the 32 patients by last review. CONCLUSION: PET staging is recommended for radical RT candidates with NSCLC. The highest yield of unexpected distant metastases is observed in Stage III.
Authors: Benedikt Schaarschmidt; Christian Buchbender; Benedikt Gomez; Christian Rubbert; Florian Hild; Jens Köhler; Johannes Grueneisen; Henning Reis; Verena Ruhlmann; Axel Wetter; Harald H Quick; Gerald Antoch; Philipp Heusch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: G Mangili; M Picchio; S Sironi; R Viganò; E Rabaiotti; D Bornaghi; V Bettinardi; C Crivellaro; C Messa; F Fazio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12
Authors: Mitchell Machtay; Fenghai Duan; Barry A Siegel; Bradley S Snyder; Jeremy J Gorelick; Janet S Reddin; Reginald Munden; Douglas W Johnson; Larry H Wilf; Albert DeNittis; Nancy Sherwin; Kwan Ho Cho; Seok-Ki Kim; Gregory Videtic; Donald R Neumann; Ritsuko Komaki; Homer Macapinlac; Jeffrey D Bradley; Abass Alavi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 44.544