BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks to temporary porta caval shunt or portal clamping. METHODOLOGY: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performed and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary porta caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback techniques in 45. RESULTS: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was documented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary porta caval shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P < 0.01). In anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P < 0.01). The venous return and the cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks to temporary porta caval shunt or portal clamping. METHODOLOGY: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performed and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary porta caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback techniques in 45. RESULTS: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was documented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary porta caval shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P < 0.01). In anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P < 0.01). The venous return and the cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.