Literature DB >> 11379331

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early esophageal cancer and esophageal dysplasia.

Y Takeo1, T Yoshida, T Shigemitu, H Yanai, N Hayashi, K Okita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Advances in diagnostic technology have led to increased detection of early esophageal cancer, which is suitable for endoscopic treatment. We performed endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection of such cancer and dysplasia using the endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection tube and evaluated the clinical benefit of this technique.
METHODOLOGY: Twenty-nine patients with esophageal mucosal cancer (27 cases with 33 lesions) or dysplasia (2 cases with 2 lesions) diagnosed between September 1992 and March 1998 were assessed endoscopically for the depth and extent of invasion by double staining with toluidine blue and iodine. Endoscopic ultrasonography was also performed to assess the depth of invasion in 22 cases with 22 lesions.
RESULTS: The 35 esophageal lesions comprised 27 esophageal carcinomas and 8 areas of dysplasia. Twenty of the 35 lesions were resected en bloc and 15 were resected piecemeal. Subsequent surgery was performed for 5 cases with 7 lesions out of 10 cases with 15 lesions that were histopathologically diagnosed as m3 or more invasive. No recurrence has been detected in 24 evaluable cases (including 1 who died of another disease, 2 in whom surgery could not be performed due to complications, and 3 who refused subsequent surgery). No patients died of esophageal cancer after a mean follow-up period of 30.9 +/- 18.9 months. The 4-year survival rate was 100% in the m2 or less invasive group of 19 cases with 20 lesions, 75% in the m3 or higher invasive group of 5 cases with 8 lesions and 100% in the surgery group of 5 cases with 7 lesions (NS). No serious complications occurred except for 1 patient. Circumferential mucosal resection was done in this patient, resulting in esophageal stenosis, which responded to esophageal dilation.
CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal mucosal resection using the endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection tube is safe and beneficial for early esophageal cancer and dysplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11379331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  7 in total

1.  Esophageal carcinoma complicating achalasia often carries a poor prognosis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Esophageal Applications.

Authors:  Granapathy Prasad; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02

Review 3.  Nonsurgical approaches to esophageal malignancy.

Authors:  Darius Sorbi; David E Fleischer
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

4.  Comparison of cervical anastomotic leak and stenosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma according to the interval of the stomach ischaemic conditioning.

Authors:  V Prochazka; F Marek; L Kunovsky; R Svaton; T Grolich; P Moravcik; M Farkasova; Z Kala
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Ines Gockel; Hauke Lang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Prognostic value and interobserver agreement of endoscopic ultrasonography for superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective study.

Authors:  Hideo Yanai; Toshiya Harada; Takeshi Okamoto; Atsuyoshi Hirano; Naori Takeo; Tomoharu Yoshida; Kiwamu Okita; Toyokazu Kawano
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

7.  Matrix metalloproteinase-7 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 are associated with unfavourable prognosis in superficial oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Y Tanioka; T Yoshida; T Yagawa; Y Saiki; S Takeo; T Harada; T Okazawa; H Yanai; K Okita
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.