Literature DB >> 11378620

Propofol and methohexital have no significant effect on mucus secretion or clearance in the anesthetized dog.

G S Padda1, C Kishioka, B K Rubin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anecdotal reports suggest that propofol (Diprivan) may stimulate mucus hypersecretion in patients without pulmonary disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of methohexital or propofol anesthesia on the physical and transport properties of airway mucus in spontaneously breathing dogs.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, crossover laboratory study.
SETTING: University laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Four healthy, purpose-bred female beagle dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: Dogs were anesthetized with 5 mg/kg of propofol by intravenous bolus followed by a maintenance infusion at 0.4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) or 4 mg/kg of methohexital followed by an infusion at 0.3 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Premedication with 0.05 mg/kg of acepromazine was given, and either atropine (0.2 mg) or saline was given by intravenous bolus at the time of induction. Dogs were intubated but spontaneously breathing throughout the experiment. Tracheal secretions were collected after induction and again after 40 mins.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The volume of secretions collected on the endotracheal tube during the 1.5-hr experiment and on a bronchoscopy brush over 10 mins during the experiment was measured. Tracheal epithelial potential difference was measured bronchoscopically by saturated agar bridges, and tracheal mucus transport velocity was determined by timing particle transport. The dynamic viscoelasticity of collected mucus was assessed by microrheometry, and secretion mucociliary transportability was measured in vitro. There were no differences in any physical or transport properties of airway secretions that could be attributed to the anesthetic agent. Secretion volume was significantly lower (p < .05) and epithelial potential difference was significantly higher (p = .03) with atropine premedication. Despite this, there were no differences in tracheal mucus transport velocity, viscoelasticity, or secretion mucociliary transportability with either anesthetic agent or with atropine.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that neither methohexital nor propofol significantly affects mucus secretion or clearance in healthy dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11378620     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  4 in total

1.  Assessing mucociliary transport of single particles in vivo shows variable speed and preference for the ventral trachea in newborn pigs.

Authors:  Mark J Hoegger; Maged Awadalla; Eman Namati; Omar A Itani; Anthony J Fischer; Alexander J Tucker; Ryan J Adam; Geoffrey McLennan; Eric A Hoffman; David A Stoltz; Michael J Welsh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Efficacy of sevoflurane as an adjuvant to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for attenuating secretions in ocular surgery.

Authors:  Hou-Chuan Lai; Yun-Hsiang Chang; Ren-Chih Huang; Nan-Kai Hung; Chueng-He Lu; Jou-Hsiu Chen; Zhi-Fu Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Activation of estrogen receptor beta-dependent nitric oxide signaling mediates the hypotensive effects of estrogen in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Cheng-Dean Shih
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 8.410

4.  What effect does isoflurane have upon ciliary beat pattern: an in vivo study.

Authors:  A Robertson; W Stannard; C Passant; C O'Callaghan; A Banerjee
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2004-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.