OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in adult patients with refractory intracranial hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective, pre- vs. postintervention study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with severe traumatic brain injury or delayed ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage with intracranial hypertension refractory to aggressive treatment, including repeated applications of tromethamine, hypertonic saline solution, barbiturate coma, and decompressive craniectomy. Patients were considered for controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage if basal cisterns on computerized tomography scan were discernible. INTERVENTIONS: After institution of a lumbar drain, cerebrospinal fluid was gradually aspirated, and then, continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage was maintained under control of intracranial pressure (ICP) and pupillary status. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure before and after initiation of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage and related complications were documented. The neurologic outcome of the patients was assessed according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale 6 months after injury. As a result of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage, all patients demonstrated an immediate and lasting decrease of ICP and a concomitant increase of cerebral perfusion pressure. Two patients temporarily showed a unilateral fixed and dilated pupil 6 and 8 hrs after onset of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage, respectively. Ten patients showed a favorable outcome, four patients survived with a severe permanent neurologic deficit, one patient remained in a persistent vegetative state, and eight patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage significantly reduces refractory intracranial hypertension. The danger of transtentorial or tonsillar herniation is minimized by considering lumbar drainage in the presence of discernible basilar cisterns only.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in adult patients with refractory intracranial hypertension. DESIGN: Prospective, pre- vs. postintervention study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with severe traumatic brain injury or delayed ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage with intracranial hypertension refractory to aggressive treatment, including repeated applications of tromethamine, hypertonic saline solution, barbituratecoma, and decompressive craniectomy. Patients were considered for controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage if basal cisterns on computerized tomography scan were discernible. INTERVENTIONS: After institution of a lumbar drain, cerebrospinal fluid was gradually aspirated, and then, continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage was maintained under control of intracranial pressure (ICP) and pupillary status. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ICP and cerebral perfusion pressure before and after initiation of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage and related complications were documented. The neurologic outcome of the patients was assessed according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale 6 months after injury. As a result of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage, all patients demonstrated an immediate and lasting decrease of ICP and a concomitant increase of cerebral perfusion pressure. Two patients temporarily showed a unilateral fixed and dilated pupil 6 and 8 hrs after onset of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage, respectively. Ten patients showed a favorable outcome, four patients survived with a severe permanent neurologic deficit, one patient remained in a persistent vegetative state, and eight patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage significantly reduces refractory intracranial hypertension. The danger of transtentorial or tonsillar herniation is minimized by considering lumbar drainage in the presence of discernible basilar cisterns only.
Authors: C Joseph Bacani; W D Freeman; Rachel A Di Trapani; Juan C Canabal; Lisa Arasi; Timothy Shine; Darrin L Willingham Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jon Pérez-Bárcena; Juan A Llompart-Pou; Javier Homar; Josep M Abadal; Joan M Raurich; Guillem Frontera; Marta Brell; Javier Ibáñez; Jordi Ibáñez Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 9.097