Literature DB >> 11378235

Diffusion, utilisation and regional variations in the use of CT and MRI in Sweden.

S Olsson1.   

Abstract

To study the diffusion, access, use, and utilisation of Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Sweden a national survey was carried out by a written questionnaire mailed to all public and private hospitals and clinics in 1997. To get a survey of CT and MRI in other countries a request asking for number of units was sent to recognised authorities and individuals in selected countries. CT and MRI were introduced in Sweden in 1973 and 1984 respectively. The diffusion of CT and MRI in Sweden are amongst the highest in the world. Considering the small size of the country and the medical community (e.g. facilitating transparency in indications for use of CT and MRI) and the relatively homogeneous health care system (tax based finance system) the regional variations in access, use, and utilisation of CT and MRI were surprisingly large. For example: In 1996 the number of CT examinations per 100.000 inhabitants varied from 3.344 to 4.705 between the regions. The MRI examinations varied from 751 to 1.858. Some of the differences may be explained by demographic factors. Also, reimbursement policies by the county councils for CT and MRI examinations varied which gave different incentives for patient referrals. However, to explain most of the differences more research is needed. Factors like proportion of elderly amongst the populations in the regions and other socio-demographic factors, proportion of research orientation of examinations and national medical specialities, organisation of the health care, etc. may to a greater extent explain the differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11378235     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2607(01)00155-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  7 in total

1.  Too much of a good thing is wonderful? A conceptual analysis of excessive examinations and diagnostic futility in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2010-05

2.  Socioeconomic status and the utilization of diagnostic imaging in an urban setting.

Authors:  Sandor Demeter; Martin Reed; Lisa Lix; Leonard MacWilliam; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Assessing socioeconomic health care utilization inequity in Israel: impact of alternative approaches to morbidity adjustment.

Authors:  Efrat Shadmi; Ran D Balicer; Karen Kinder; Chad Abrams; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Geographical variation in radiological services: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Ingelin Børretzen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Effects of a reimbursement change and travel times on the delivery of private and public radiology services in Norway: a register-based longitudinal study of Norwegian claims data.

Authors:  Anastasia Mokienko
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2019-10-16

6.  What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists' perceptions.

Authors:  Kristin B Lysdahl; Bjørn M Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  The impact of global budget on the diffusion of innovations: the example of positron emission tomography in Taiwan.

Authors:  Che-Ming Yang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.