AIMS: To evaluate prospectively the impact of carvedilol on a short-term physical training program in stable patients with moderate chronic heart failure (CHF), and to analyze parameters predictive of improvement after training. METHODS AND RESULTS:Thirty-eight patients with CHF were referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Etiology was ischemic in 26 patients, dilated in 12 patients and left ventricular ejection fraction was <35%. Patients were classified into three groups: group 1 (n=14)=ACE inhibitors, diuretics and digitalis; group 2 (n=11)=idem group 1+cardioselective beta-blocker; group 3 (n=13)=idem group 1+carvedilol. Exercise tests with VO2 measurement were performed before and after a 4-week exercise training program. Patients with carvedilol experienced a 16.6% increase in peak VO2 which was similar to the 13.9% increase in the group with cardioselective beta-blocker and to the 18.5% in the group without beta-blocker. Moreover non-ischemic etiology of CHF was the only parameter predictive of improvement after training (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Addition of carvedilol did not alter benefits of a short-term physical training program in patients with moderate CHF. No baseline characteristic except for etiology of CHF was predictive of a response to training.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To evaluate prospectively the impact of carvedilol on a short-term physical training program in stable patients with moderate chronic heart failure (CHF), and to analyze parameters predictive of improvement after training. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with CHF were referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Etiology was ischemic in 26 patients, dilated in 12 patients and left ventricular ejection fraction was <35%. Patients were classified into three groups: group 1 (n=14)=ACE inhibitors, diuretics and digitalis; group 2 (n=11)=idem group 1+cardioselective beta-blocker; group 3 (n=13)=idem group 1+carvedilol. Exercise tests with VO2 measurement were performed before and after a 4-week exercise training program. Patients with carvedilol experienced a 16.6% increase in peak VO2 which was similar to the 13.9% increase in the group with cardioselective beta-blocker and to the 18.5% in the group without beta-blocker. Moreover non-ischemic etiology of CHF was the only parameter predictive of improvement after training (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Addition of carvedilol did not alter benefits of a short-term physical training program in patients with moderate CHF. No baseline characteristic except for etiology of CHF was predictive of a response to training.
Authors: Jerome L Fleg; Lawton S Cooper; Barry A Borlaug; Mark J Haykowsky; William E Kraus; Benjamin D Levine; Marc A Pfeffer; Ileana L Piña; David C Poole; Gordon R Reeves; David J Whellan; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 8.790