Literature DB >> 11377729

Effects of intralaminar thalamic lesions on sensory attention and motor intention in the rat: a comparison with lesions involving frontal cortex and hippocampus.

J A Burk1, R G Mair.   

Abstract

A self-paced serial reaction task was developed to differentiate between the effects of intralaminar thalamic lesions on sensory attention and intentional motor function. Results were compared for hippocampal and frontal cortical lesions to test for the possible involvement of pathways involving these parts of the brain in any impairments associated with the thalamic lesion. Lesions of the intralaminar thalamic nuclei affected response latency without affecting accuracy. This increase in latency was unaffected by variations in stimulus duration, even though this manipulation had a substantial effect on response accuracy. Intralaminar lesions did not affect the response to distracting stimuli or to manipulations of stimulus salience. Thus it seems unlikely that the effects of intralaminar lesions on motor function were related to sensory loss or attentional dysfunction. Hippocampal lesions had no significant effect on any measure of performance. Frontal cortical lesions were associated with an increase in latency comparable to the intralaminar group and also affected the accuracy of responding to brief stimuli or under conditions of reduced stimulus salience. These results are discussed in light of evidence that lesions of the intralaminar nuclei affect functions mediated by anatomically related areas of frontal cortex and striatum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11377729     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00202-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Blunted hippocampal, but not striatal, acetylcholine efflux parallels learning impairment in diencephalic-lesioned rats.

Authors:  Jessica J Roland; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Different activation patterns for working memory load and visual attention load.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Cognitive enhancement with central thalamic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Prasad Shirvalkar; Malika Seth; Nicholas D Schiff; Daniel G Herrera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Limbic circuitry of the midline thalamus.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes; Stephanie B Linley; Walter B Hoover
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Lesions of reuniens and rhomboid thalamic nuclei impair radial maze win-shift performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hembrook; Robert G Mair
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Effects of clonidine in the locus coeruleus on prefrontal- and hippocampal-dependent measures of attention and memory in the rat.

Authors:  Robert D Mair; Yueping Zhang; Kathleen R Bailey; Margaret M Toupin; Robert G Mair
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Translational rodent models of Korsakoff syndrome reveal the critical neuroanatomical substrates of memory dysfunction and recovery.

Authors:  Lisa M Savage; Joseph M Hall; Leticia S Resende
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 8.  Comparing the prefrontal cortex of rats and primates: insights from electrophysiology.

Authors:  Jeremy K Seamans; Christopher C Lapish; Daniel Durstewitz
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

9.  Involvement of the prefrontal cortex but not the dorsal hippocampus in the attention-enhancing effects of nicotine in rats.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Mohammed Shoaib; Ian P Stolerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Contralateral corticothalamic projections from MI whisker cortex: potential route for modulating hemispheric interactions.

Authors:  Kevin D Alloway; Michelle L Olson; Jared B Smith
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.