Literature DB >> 11377319

Contemporary use of complexed PSA and calculated percent free PSA for early detection of prostate cancer: impact of changing disease demographics.

M C Miller1, G J O'Dowd, A W Partin, R W Veltri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA), total PSA (tPSA), and calculated free/total PSA (f/t PSA) ratios in the differentiation of benign disease from prostate cancer (CaP) using a contemporary patient cohort.
METHODS: The cPSA, tPSA, and calculated fPSA values were determined using the Bayer Immuno-1 system. To validate our calculated f/t PSA ratio, we also retrospectively measured fPSA using the Abbott AxSYM immunoassay system in archival pretreatment sera obtained between 1990 and 1997 from 362 men with clinically and biopsy-confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 179) or CaP (n = 183). The diagnostic utility of tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was assessed using a contemporary test population consisting of sera prospectively collected between June 1999 and June 2000 from 3006 men who had recently undergone a systematic biopsy by urologists in clinical practices throughout the United States. This contemporary patient sample had biopsy diagnoses of either no evidence of malignancy (n = 1857) or CaP (n = 1149). All serum samples had tPSA values between 2.0 and 20.0 ng/mL.
RESULTS: The measured versus calculated f/t PSA ratios had a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.9130 in the retrospectively studied population of 362 men. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUCs) for the measured and calculated f/t PSA ratios were indistinguishable (69.6% versus 69.2%, respectively). In the contemporary population (n = 3006), the ROC-AUC for tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was 52.2%, 53.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. We also compared the diagnostic performance using published cutoffs for tPSA (greater than 4.0 ng/mL), cPSA (greater than 3.8 ng/mL), and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 15% and greater than 25%) in tPSA reflex ranges of 2 to 20 ng/mL and 2 to 10 ng/mL. We found that both cPSA and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 25% cutoff) outperformed tPSA and yielded similar results in terms of biopsies spared and cancers missed.
CONCLUSIONS: The calculated f/t PSA ratio and cPSA perform equally well in terms of the improvement of specificity in the discrimination of benign disease and CaP. The f/t PSA ratio and cPSA provide clinical benefits over the use of tPSA alone, such as an increased sparing of unnecessary biopsies performed with a manageable degree of risk of delayed cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11377319     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)00953-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  Assays for complexed prostate-specific antigen and other advances in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  Development of simultaneous detection of total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free PSA with rapid bead-based immunoassay.

Authors:  Chong Xie; Guomin Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Detection of prostate cancer with complexed PSA and complexed/total PSA ratio - is there any advantage?

Authors:  F Strittmatter; P Stieber; D Nagel; C Füllhase; S Walther; C G Stief; R Waidelich
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 4.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Using nuclear morphometry to predict the need for treatment among men with low grade, low stage prostate cancer enrolled in a program of expectant management with curative intent.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; M Craig Miller; Patricia Landis; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 6.  Prostate-specific antigen and related isoforms in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 biomarker serum immunoassay in combination with PSA is a more specific diagnostic tool for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ji Li; Robert W Veltri; Zhen Yuan; Christhunesa S Christudass; Wlodek Mandecki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation and multi-institutional validation of a novel urine biomarker lncRNA546 to improve the diagnostic specificity of prostate cancer in PSA gray-zone.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Xiaolei Shi; Fangming Wang; Sujun Han; Dong Chen; Xu Gao; Linhui Wang; Qiang Wei; Nianzeng Xing; Shancheng Ren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.