Literature DB >> 11377248

Ethidium bromide and SYBR Green I enhance the genotoxicity of UV-irradiation and chemical mutagens in E. coli.

T Ohta1, S Tokishita, H Yamagata.   

Abstract

Ethidium bromide (EtBr) and SYBR Green I are nucleic acid gel stains and used commonly in combination with UV-illumination. EtBr preferentially induces frameshift mutations but only in the presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system, while SYBR Green I is a very weak mutagen that induces frameshift mutations. We found that EtBr and SYBR Green I, without an added metabolic activation system, strongly potentiated the base-substitution mutations induced by UV-irradiation in E. coli B/r WP2 cells. Each DNA stain alone showed no mutagenicity to the strain. Base-substitutions induced by 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX) and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide were similarly potentiated by EtBr and SYBR Green I. SYBR Green I had a much greater effect. No enhancing effects were observed on mutations induced by mitomycin C, cisplatin, transplatin, cumene hydroperoxide, base analogs, and alkylating agents. Another DNA stain, acridine orange, showed similar enhancing effects on UV- and MX-mutagenicity, but no effect was observed for 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). UV- and MX-induced mutations in E. coli WP2s (uvrA), which is defective in nucleotide excision repair activity, were not potentiated by the addition of EtBr, SYBR Green I, or acridine orange. Those nucleic acid stains might inhibit the nucleotide excision repair of DNA damaged by UV and MX treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11377248     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00155-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

Review 1.  Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.

Authors:  Maria Magana; Christina Sereti; Anastasios Ioannidis; Courtney A Mitchell; Anthony R Ball; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Michael R Hamblin; Maria Hadjifrangiskou; George P Tegos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Roles of the mitochondrial genetics in cancer metastasis: not to be ignored any longer.

Authors:  Thomas C Beadnell; Adam D Scheid; Carolyn J Vivian; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Tracing and ablation of single cells in the mammalian blastocyst using fluorescent DNA staining and multi-photon laser microscopy.

Authors:  Tobias Reupke; Bernd Püschel; Christoph Viebahn
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.304

4.  Are other fluorescent tags used instead of ethidium bromide safer?

Authors:  Soodabeh Saeidnia; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Synthesis and characterization of azo-guanidine based alcoholic media naked eye DNA sensor.

Authors:  Ataf Ali Altaf; Uzma Hashmat; Muhammad Yousaf; Bhajan Lal; Shafiq Ullah; Alvin A Holder; Amin Badshah
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  Current Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods and Their Implications to Point-of-Care Diagnostics.

Authors:  Nasir Ali; Rita de Cássia Pontello Rampazzo; Alexandre Dias Tavares Costa; Marco Aurelio Krieger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Characterization of EvaGreen and the implication of its physicochemical properties for qPCR applications.

Authors:  Fei Mao; Wai-Yee Leung; Xing Xin
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.563

8.  Development of highly sensitive and low-cost DNA agarose gel electrophoresis detection systems, and evaluation of non-mutagenic and loading dye-type DNA-staining reagents.

Authors:  Ken Motohashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.