Literature DB >> 11376836

Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour.

B N. Milligan1, D Fraser, D L. Kramer.   

Abstract

In domestic pigs, litter-mates often vary considerably in birth weight. To examine whether this size variation influences piglet survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour, we experimentally manipulated the number and size distribution of litter-mates in 51 litters. Litters were small (eight or nine piglets) or large (11 or 12 piglets) compared to the herd mean of 10 piglets, and were made more or less variable in weight by using the largest and smallest quartiles of two combined litters (variable) or the middle two quartiles (uniform). Weights were measured on days 0, 3 and 21. Behavioural measures (percent of nursings missed, mean teat consistency score, per capita number of teat disputes before milk ejection, and percent time spent in teat disputes in the 20min after milk ejection) were recorded on days 1, 4, 10 and 17. Piglet weight variation (percent of coefficient of variation, CV) almost doubled over the 21 days in uniform litters and actually decreased in variable litters, but still remained higher in the variable litters. Overall, survival, percent of nursings missed, consistency in piglets' use of teats, number of teat disputes, percent time a piglet spent in teat disputes after milk ejection, and weight gain were unaffected by birth weight variation although there was a tendency (P=0.09) for more piglet deaths in variable litters. Behavioural measures of sibling competition were higher in large litters. The data provide little support for the hypotheses that high birth weight variation results in decreased survival, or that it permits rapid establishment of dominance, thereby reducing wasteful competitive behaviour in surviving piglets.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376836     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00136-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  7 in total

Review 1.  Within-litter variation in birth weight: impact of nutritional status in the sow.

Authors:  Tao-lin Yuan; Yu-hua Zhu; Meng Shi; Tian-tian Li; Na Li; Guo-yao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Jian-jun Zang; Feng-lai Wang; Jun-jun Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

3.  Estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters for individual birth weight, weaning weight, and probe weight in Yorkshire and Landrace pigs.

Authors:  Kristen Alves; Flavio S Schenkel; Luiz F Brito; Andy Robinson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Behaviors and body weight of suckling piglets in different social environments.

Authors:  Joon-Ki Hong; Ki-Hyun Kim; Hyun-Su Hwang; Jae-Kang Lee; Tae-Kyung Eom; Shin-Jae Rhim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 5.  A Review of Success Factors for Piglet Fostering in Lactation.

Authors:  Jena G Alexopoulos; David S Lines; Suzanne Hallett; Kate J Plush
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  What is the current significance of low birthweight pigs on commercial farms in Northern Ireland in terms of impaired growth and mortality?

Authors:  Samuel J Hawe; Nigel Scollan; Alan Gordon; Elizabeth Magowan
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-31

7.  Does Nursing Behaviour of Sows in Loose-Housing Pens Differ from That of Sows in Farrowing Pens with Crates?

Authors:  Dierck-Hinrich Wiechers; Swetlana Herbrandt; Nicole Kemper; Michaela Fels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.