Literature DB >> 11376682

The contribution of endogenous sources of DNA damage to the multiple mutations in cancer.

A L Jackson1, L A Loeb.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that most human cancers contain multiple mutations. By the time a tumor is clinically detectable it may have accumulated tens of thousands of mutations. In normal cells, mutations are rare events occurring at a rate of 10(-10) mutations per nucleotide per cell per generation. We have argued that the mutation rates exhibited by normal human cells are insufficient to account for the large number of mutations found in human cancers, and therefore, that an early event in tumorigenesis is the development of a mutator phenotype. In normal cells, spontaneous and induced DNA damage is balanced by multiple pathways for DNA repair, and most DNA damage is repaired without error. However, in tumor cells this balance may be shifted such that damage overwhelms the repair capacity, resulting in the accumulation of multiple mutations. Our hypothesis is that multiple random mutations occur during carcinogenesis. The sequential mutations that are observed in some human tumors result from selective events required for tumor progression. We consider the possibility that endogenous sources of DNA damage, in particular oxidative DNA damage, may contribute to genomic instability and to a mutator phenotype in some tumors. Endogenous and environmental sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are abundant. In tumor cells, antioxidant or DNA repair capacity may be insufficient to compensate for the production of ROS, and these endogenous ROS may be capable of damaging DNA and inducing mutations in critical DNA stability genes. The possibility that oxidative DNA damage could be a significant source of the genomic instability characteristic of human cancers is exciting, because it may be feasible to modulate the extent of oxidative damage through antioxidant therapy. The use of antioxidants to reduce the extent of molecular damage by ROS could delay the progression of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376682     DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00091-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  152 in total

1.  The TFIIB tip domain couples transcription initiation to events involved in RNA processing.

Authors:  Khiem Tran; Jay D Gralla
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Superoxide dismutase 2 gene and cancer risk: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang Wook Kang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Point mutation instability (PIN) mutator phenotype as model for true back mutations seen in hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 - a hypothesis.

Authors:  Etresia van Dyk; Pieter J Pretorius
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Negative feedback control of HIF-1 through REDD1-regulated ROS suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Peter Horak; Andrew R Crawford; Douangsone D Vadysirisack; Zachary M Nash; M Phillip DeYoung; Dennis Sgroi; Leif W Ellisen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Structure of the Keap1:Nrf2 interface provides mechanistic insight into Nrf2 signaling.

Authors:  Shih-Ching Lo; Xuchu Li; Michael T Henzl; Lesa J Beamer; Mark Hannink
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Methylation of multiple genes in gastric glands with intestinal metaplasia: A disorder with polyclonal origins.

Authors:  Mami Mihara; Yukinari Yoshida; Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Ken-ichi Inada; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Yukiko Yagi; Kohzoh Imai; Takashi Sugimura; Masae Tatematsu; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Targeting Obesity-Induced Macrophages during Preneoplastic Growth Promotes Mammary Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Activity, DNA Damage, and Tumor Formation.

Authors:  Tamara Chamberlin; Megan Clack; Caylee Silvers; Genevra Kuziel; Victoria Thompson; Haley Johnson; Lisa M Arendt
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Oxidative DNA damage induced by copper and hydrogen peroxide promotes CG-->TT tandem mutations at methylated CpG dinucleotides in nucleotide excision repair-deficient cells.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Timothy R O'Connor; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Antioxidant vitamins and cancer risk: is oxidative damage to DNA a relevant biomarker?

Authors:  Steffen Loft; Peter Møller; Marcus S Cooke; Rafal Rozalski; Ryszard Olinski
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.614

10.  DNA hypermethylation regulates the expression of members of the Mu-class glutathione S-transferases and glutathione peroxidases in Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  D F Peng; M Razvi; H Chen; K Washington; A Roessner; R Schneider-Stock; W El-Rifai
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.