Literature DB >> 11376249

Outcome of polyester cuff retention following traction removal of tunneled central venous catheters.

M D Kohli1, S O Trerotola, J Namyslowski, M S Stecker, G McLennan, N H Patel, M S Johnson, H Shah, R Seshadri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To elucidate the factors that contribute to cuff retention during traction removal of tunneled catheters, as well as to determine the risk of complication associated with polyester cuff retention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 428 tunneled, cuffed catheters were removed with traction and local anesthesia. Polyester cuff retention was recorded when it occurred, and the effects of cuff retention were determined at a mean follow-up of 250 days. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the variables influencing cuff retention.
RESULTS: Traction removal was successful in 428 (100%) patients. Of 428 catheters removed, 41 (10%) cuffs were retained. Silicone 10-F double-lumen and 9.6-F single-lumen catheters had a higher rate of cuff retention (27 [32%] of 84 and nine [39%] of 23, respectively) than did the split-tip polyurethane hemodialysis catheter (two [1%] of 196; P <.001). Cuff retention rates among other catheter types compared with that of the polyurethane catheter were not significantly different. Duration of catheter dwell did not significantly influence cuff retention. Of 41 retained cuffs, three required removal with cutdown for cuff migration to the exit site, which inhibited healing (n = 1); for suspected infection (n = 1); or for cosmetic purposes as requested by the patient (n = 1). The remaining patients had no complications associated with cuff retention.
CONCLUSION: Traction removal of smaller-bore silicone catheters is more likely to result in cuff retention than removal of larger silicone and polyurethane catheters, and cuff retention is usually inconsequential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11376249     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn05651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Foreign Body Reaction due to a Retained Cuff from a Central Venous Catheter.

Authors:  So Min Kim; Hee Jin Jun; Hei Sung Kim; Sang Hyun Cho; Jeong Deuk Lee
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 2.  Elective removal of cuffed central venous catheters in children.

Authors:  Anselm C W Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Tunnelled Haemodialysis Catheter Removal: An Underappreciated Problem, Not Always Simple and Safe.

Authors:  Tomasz Porazko; Jacek Hobot; Zbigniew Ziembik; Marian Klinger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.