Literature DB >> 11374535

Use of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm as a generic solver for mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications.

S Tsuruta1, I Misztal, I Strandén.   

Abstract

Utility of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm with a diagonal preconditioner for solving mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications was evaluated with 16 test problems. The problems included single- and multiple-trait analyses, with data on beef, dairy, and swine ranging from small examples to national data sets. Multiple-trait models considered low and high genetic correlations. Convergence was based on relative differences between left- and right-hand sides. The ordering of equations was fixed effects followed by random effects, with no special ordering within random effects. The preconditioned conjugate gradient program implemented with double precision converged for all models. However, when implemented in single precision, the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm did not converge for seven large models. The preconditioned conjugate gradient and successive overrelaxation algorithms were subsequently compared for 13 of the test problems. The preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm was easy to implement with the iteration on data for general models. However, successive overrelaxation requires specific programming for each set of models. On average, the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm converged in three times fewer rounds of iteration than successive overrelaxation. With straightforward implementations, programs using the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm may be two or more times faster than those using successive overrelaxation. However, programs using the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm would use more memory than would comparable implementations using successive overrelaxation. Extensive optimization of either algorithm can influence rankings. The preconditioned conjugate gradient implemented with iteration on data, a diagonal preconditioner, and in double precision may be the algorithm of choice for solving mixed-model equations when sufficient memory is available and ease of implementation is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11374535     DOI: 10.2527/2001.7951166x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Fast Algorithms for Conducting Large-Scale GWAS of Age-at-Onset Traits Using Cox Mixed-Effects Models.

Authors:  Liang He; Alexander M Kulminski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Adjustments for heterogeneous herd-year variances in a random regression model for genetic evaluations of Polish Black-and-White cattle.

Authors:  Tomasz Strabel; Tomasz Jankowski; Janusz Jamrozik
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers.

Authors:  Gerhard Moser; Mehar S Khatkar; Ben J Hayes; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.

Authors:  Daniela A L Lourenco; Breno O Fragomeni; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Birgit Zumbach; Rachel J Hawken; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species.

Authors:  Ivan Pocrnic; Daniela A L Lourenco; Yutaka Masuda; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Deflated preconditioned conjugate gradient method for solving single-step BLUP models efficiently.

Authors:  Jérémie Vandenplas; Herwin Eding; Mario P L Calus; Cornelis Vuik
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  PIBLUP: High-Performance Software for Large-Scale Genetic Evaluation of Animals and Plants.

Authors:  Huimin Kang; Chao Ning; Lei Zhou; Shengli Zhang; Ning Yang; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.

Authors:  Daniela Lourenco; Andres Legarra; Shogo Tsuruta; Yutaka Masuda; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.

Authors:  Fernando L Macedo; Ole F Christensen; Jean-Michel Astruc; Ignacio Aguilar; Yutaka Masuda; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.