Literature DB >> 11373870

What is the optimal therapy of brain metastases?

Y Marcou1, C Lindquist, C Adams, S Retsas, P N Plowman.   

Abstract

The conclusions of a symposium held in London in October 1999 and devoted to the optimal management of brain metastatic disease were: 1. Prognostic factors are: size and number of metastases (and the presence of mass effect); the status of the systemic cancer outside the central nervous system; performance/neurological status; the age of the patient; and the type of cancer. 2. Surgical management of the single, superficially located brain metastasis with symptomatic mass effect is recommended in good performance status patients. Many would follow this routinely by whole brain radiotherapy. 3. Whole brain radiotherapy is often not followed by durable control of the disease and carries morbidity; better management plans are required. In poor prognosis patients the delivery of radiotherapy may not always be indicated. 4. The current literature demonstrates that stereotactic radiosurgery can enhance the likelihood of sterilizing individual brain metastases compared with whole brain radiotherapy alone. 5. The results of questionnaire showed that the histological diagnosis and latency to onset made little difference to the opinion of neuroscience clinicians, who generally favoured stereotactic radiation therapy over whole brain radiotherapy (with or without a conventionally delivered boost) for all patients with less than four metastases. The opinions of oncologists differed. For bronchial and breast cancer patients, whole brain radiotherapy, with or without a boost, was favoured by the majority, particularly in oat cell cancer. However, with a long latency to 'isolated' brain metastasis, oncologists favoured focal radiation therapy. There was a strong preference amongst oncology experts to reserve stereotactic radiation therapy for apparently isolated brain metastasis; this opinion applied to bronchus and breast cancer, and also to melanoma. 6. Whole brain radiotherapy followed by positron emission tomography scanning to determine what viable metastatic disease remained (and potentially treatable by stereotactic/focal technology) was favoured by most of delegates who answered this question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11373870     DOI: 10.1053/clon.2001.9230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  5 in total

Review 1.  Radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: critical review regarding complications.

Authors:  Marcos Vinícius Calfat Maldaun; Paulo Henrique Pires Aguiar; Frederick Lang; Dima Suki; David Wildrick; Raymond Sawaya
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Prospective study of stereotactic radiosurgery without whole brain radiotherapy in patients with four or less brain metastases: incidence of intracranial progression and salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Imjai Chitapanarux; Bryan Goss; Roy Vongtama; Leonardo Frighetto; Antonio De Salles; Michael Selch; Michael Duick; Timothy Solberg; Robert Wallace; Cynthia Cabatan-Awang; Judith Ford
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Defining treatment for brain metastases patients: nihilism versus optimism.

Authors:  Peter S Craighead; Alexander Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Chikao Sugie; Hiromitsu Iwata
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Multimodality treatment of brain metastases: an institutional survival analysis of 275 patients.

Authors:  Ameer L Elaimy; Alexander R Mackay; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Robert K Fairbanks; John J Demakas; Barton S Cooke; Benjamin J Peressini; John T Holbrook; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.