Literature DB >> 11373411

Lenercept (p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein) in severe sepsis and early septic shock: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial with 1,342 patients.

E Abraham1, P F Laterre, J Garbino, S Pingleton, T Butler, T Dugernier, B Margolis, K Kudsk, W Zimmerli, P Anderson, M Reynaert, D Lew, W Lesslauer, S Passe, P Cooper, A Burdeska, M Modi, A Leighton, M Salgo, P Van der Auwera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Phase III study to confirm a trend observed in a previous phase II study showing that a single dose of lenercept, human recombinant p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor-immunoglobulin G1 (TNFR55-IgG1) fusion protein, decreased mortality in patients with severe sepsis or early septic shock.
DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, phase III, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
SETTING: A total of 108 community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States (60), Canada (6) and Europe (42). PATIENTS: A total of 1,342 patients were recruited who fulfilled the entry criteria within the 12-hr period preceding the study drug administration. INTERVENTION: After randomization, an intravenous dose of 0.125 mg/kg lenercept or placebo was given. The patient was monitored for up to 28 days, during which standard diagnostic, supportive, and therapeutic care was provided.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was 28-day all-cause mortality. Baseline characteristics were as follows: a total of 1,342 patients were randomized; 662 received lenercept and 680 received placebo. The mean age was 60.5 yrs (range, 17-96 yrs); 39% were female; 65% had medical admissions, 8% had scheduled surgical admissions, and 27% had unscheduled surgical admissions; 73% had severe sepsis without shock, and 27% had severe sepsis with early septic shock. Lenercept and placebo groups were similar at baseline with respect to demographic characteristics, simplified acute physiology score II-predicted mortality, profiles of clinical site of infection and microbiological documentation, number of dysfunctioning organs, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma concentration. Lenercept pharmacokinetics were similar in severe sepsis and early septic shock patients. Tumor necrosis factor was bound in a stable manner to lenercept as reflected by the accumulation of total serum tumor necrosis factor alpha concentrations. There were 369 deaths, 177 on lenercept (27% mortality) and 192 on placebo (28% mortality). A one-sided Cochran-Armitage test, stratified by geographic region and baseline, predicted 28-day all-cause mortality (simplified acute physiology score II), gave a p value of .141 (one-sided). Lenercept treatment had no effect on incidence or resolution of organ dysfunctions. There was no evidence that lenercept was detrimental in the overall population.
CONCLUSION: Lenercept had no significant effect on mortality in the study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11373411     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200103000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  76 in total

Review 1.  The evolving experience with therapeutic TNF inhibition in sepsis: considering the potential influence of risk of death.

Authors:  Ping Qiu; Xizhong Cui; Amisha Barochia; Yan Li; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.206

2.  Optimal antibiotic treatment in severe pneumococcal pneumonia--time for real answers.

Authors:  G W Waterer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  COPs and POPs: modulators of inflammasome activity.

Authors:  Christian Stehlik; Andrea Dorfleutner
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  The anti-inflammatory effect of combined complement and CD14 inhibition is preserved during escalating bacterial load.

Authors:  Kjetil H Egge; Andreas Barratt-Due; Stig Nymo; Julie K Lindstad; Anne Pharo; Corinna Lau; Terje Espevik; Ebbe B Thorgersen; Tom E Mollnes
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Scientific and clinical challenges in sepsis.

Authors:  Luis Ulloa; Michael Brunner; Laura Ramos; Edwin A Deitch
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.116

6.  Balanced control of both hyper and hypo-inflammatory phases as a new treatment paradigm in sepsis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Spiros Chondropoulos; Konstantinos Gkirkas; Josef Meletiadis; Ioanna Dimopoulou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Sepsis reconsidered: Identifying novel metrics for behavioral landscape characterization with a high-performance computing implementation of an agent-based model.

Authors:  Chase Cockrell; Gary An
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Development of a genomic metric that can be rapidly used to predict clinical outcome in severely injured trauma patients.

Authors:  Alex G Cuenca; Lori F Gentile; M Cecilia Lopez; Ricardo Ungaro; Huazhi Liu; Wenzhong Xiao; Junhee Seok; Michael N Mindrinos; Darwin Ang; Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti; Azra Bihorac; Philip A Efron; Joseph Cuschieri; H Shaw Warren; Ronald G Tompkins; Ronald V Maier; Henry V Baker; Lyle L Moldawer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Chronic sepsis mortality characterized by an individualized inflammatory response.

Authors:  Marcin F Osuchowski; Kathy Welch; Huan Yang; Javed Siddiqui; Daniel G Remick
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  Economic aspects of severe sepsis: a review of intensive care unit costs, cost of illness and cost effectiveness of therapy.

Authors:  Hilmar Burchardi; Heinz Schneider
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.