Literature DB >> 11372905

Pharmaceutical care research and education project: pharmacists' interventions.

R Kassam1, K B Farris, L Burback, C I Volume, C E Cox, A Cave.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the processes of care used by community pharmacists participating in the Pharmaceutical Care Research and Education Project (PREP) in terms of drug-related problems (DRPs), pharmacists' recommendations, and status of DRPs at follow-up, and to determine characteristics associated with DRPs.
DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of the treatment group from a larger randomized, controlled cluster design.
SETTING: Five independent community pharmacies in Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients who were covered under Alberta Health and Wellness's senior drug benefit plan (i.e., 65 years or older), were taking three or more medications concurrently according to pharmacy records, were able to complete telephone interviews as determined by pharmacists, maintained residence in Alberta for 12 of the 15 study months, agreed to receive their prescription medications only from the study pharmacy during the study period, and provided informed consent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of DRPs, recommendations, status of DRPs, and analysis of clinical results as determined during pharmacists' follow-up care.
RESULTS: In telephone surveys, patients reported taking 4.7 prescription medications per day, but pharmacists documented 8.7 prescription medications per day in their records. Pharmacists documented 559 DRPs, a mean (+/- SD) of 3.9+/-3.2 problems per patient. Approximately 39% of problems were actual DRPs, while 60% were potential DRPs. Medical conditions associated most frequently with a DRP involved the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems. The most common DRP categories were "patient requires drug therapy" or "patient requires influenza or pneumococcal vaccination." Pharmacists wrote 551 initial clinical notes using the subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) format, and they recorded 346 follow-up interventions, also using SOAP notes. Counseling, preventive consultations, and clinical monitoring represented 40% of their recommendations. In 80% of situations, the pharmacist made the recommendation directly to the patient. On follow-up, 40% of the 559 DRPs identified were resolved, controlled, or improved. Patients accepted 76% of pharmacists' recommendations, and physicians accepted 72% of pharmacists' suggested resolutions of DRPs. Pharmacists were more likely to follow up about actual DRPs, as compared with potential ones; overall, they followed up on 62% of identified DRPs.
CONCLUSION: Pharmacists identified more DRPs for study patients than previous community-based, observational studies have reported. Undertreatment appears to be a prevalent DRP. Community pharmacists' recommendations to prevent and resolve DRPs were made primarily to patients and were well accepted. More follow-up was needed for all DRPs. When follow-up occurred, the DRP results generally showed improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11372905     DOI: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)31254-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  25 in total

1.  Is adherence to drug treatment correlated with health-related quality of life?

Authors:  Isabelle Côté; Karen Farris; David Feeny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Drug-related problems in general practice: results from a development project in Denmark.

Authors:  Birthe Soendergaard; Bente Kirkeby; Christine Dinsen; Hanne Herborg; Jakob Kjellberg; Peter Staehr
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-09-01

3.  Evaluation of pharmaceutical care opportunities within an advanced pharmacy practice experience.

Authors:  Rosemin Kassam
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Pharmacists' and pharmacy students' ability to identify drug-related problems using TIMER (Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review).

Authors:  Sarah Snyder Lee; Ann K Schwemm; Jeffrey Reist; Matthew Cantrell; Michael Andreski; William R Doucette; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Karen B Farris
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  An enhanced community advanced pharmacy practice experience model to improve patient care.

Authors:  Rosemin Kassam; Mona Kwong
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Application of drug-related problem (DRP) classification systems: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Benjamin J Basger; Rebekah J Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  A New Method of Identifying Characteristics of Needing Help to Take Medications in an Older Representative Community-Dwelling Population: The Older Adults Medication Assist Scale.

Authors:  Brenda D Jamerson; Gerda G Fillenbaum; Richard Sloane; Miriam C Morey
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  The relationship between the extent of collaboration of general practitioners and pharmacists and the implementation of recommendations arising from medication review: a systematic review.

Authors:  Henk-Frans Kwint; Lynette Bermingham; Adrianne Faber; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Marcel L Bouvy
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Racial disparities in the quality of medication use in older adults: baseline findings from a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mary T Roth; Denise A Esserman; Jena L Ivey; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Diane L Lorenzetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.