Literature DB >> 11371969

Early diuresis renogram findings predict success following pyeloplasty.

H G Pohl1, H G Rushton, J S Park, A B Belman, M Majd.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether drainage across the ureteropelvic junction, as indicated by diuretic renography 3 months after pyeloplasty, is an adequate predictor of surgical success.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 150 children who underwent pyeloplasty from 1986 to 1995 were reviewed. After excluding nonevaluable cases a total of 127 renal units remained for investigation. Preoperatively each renal unit was examined with a standardized (well-tempered) furosemide stimulated renal scan. Postoperatively 60 renal units were evaluated with standardized diuretic renal scans at 3 and 12 months, 33 renal units at 3 months only and 34 renal units at 12 months only. Surgical success was defined by half-time less than 20 minutes on a standardized diuretic renogram.
RESULTS: Of the 33 renal units with a single postoperative study at 3 months 32 (97%) had halftime less than 20 minutes on diuretic renography. The remaining patient in this group with half-time greater than 20 minutes showed 60% improvement in half-time and did not require reoperation. Excluding those without delayed followup, surgical success was obtained in 93 of the 94 (99%) renal units. Among the 60 renal units evaluated with 2 postoperative renal scans success was noted in 48 (80%) and 59 (98%) at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Stenosis did not recur in 48 renal units with half-time less than 20 minutes 3 months after repair. In 1 case that had been treated for postoperative urinoma half-time was greater than 40 minutes at 3 months and repeat pyeloplasty was required.
CONCLUSIONS: Half-time less than 20 minutes 3 months after pyeloplasty predicts surgical success. Most renal units that improve but still have half-times greater than 20 minutes on an early diuretic renogram will demonstrate continued improvement in drainage patterns at 12 months. Those renal units that show no improvement at 3 months may require reoperation and those with half-time less than 20 minutes at 3 months do not require further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371969     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200106001-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  (99m)Tc-DTPA diuretic renal scintigraphy in dogs with nephroureterolithiasis.

Authors:  Silke Hecht; S Meg Lawson; India F Lane; Dorothy E Sharp; Gregory B Daniel
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  National Trends in Followup Imaging after Pyeloplasty in Children in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Thomas S Lendvay; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Giant hydronephrosis: still a reality!

Authors:  Kawaljit Singh Kaura; Manoj Kumar; Ashok Kr Sokhal; Ashok Kr Gupta; Bimalesh Purkait; Durgesh Saini; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty procedures: a series of 18 patients.

Authors:  Kemal Ener; Serkan Altınova; Abdullah Erdem Canda; Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Erem Asil; Emre Ürer; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Trends in followup imaging after adult pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Sohrab Arora; Varun Mittal; Nitesh Patidar; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  Factors Accountable for Unabated Obstruction Following Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Uday Sankar Chatterjee; Ashoke Kumar Basu; Debashis Mitra; Subir Kumar Chatterjee
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2021-01-11

9.  Follow-up after pyeloplasty: How long?

Authors:  T J Nirmal; J C Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-07

10.  Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kadihasanoglu; Ugur Yucetas; Emre Karabay; Erkan Sonmezay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.