Literature DB >> 11371895

Bone anchor infections in female pelvic reconstructive procedures: a literature review of series and case reports.

R R Rackley1, J B Abdelmalak, S Madjar, A Yanilmaz, R A Appell, M B Tchetgen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the reported prevalence of infectious osseous complications due to the use of bone anchors for suture fixation in female pelvic reconstructive procedures. In addition, the type and method of bone anchors as well as the reported pathogens associated with osseous infections were reviewed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary reported series of female pelvic reconstructive procedures involving bone anchor suture fixation referenced in Index Medicus from January 1990 to July 2000 were extracted using the MEDLINE bibliographic database on English language articles involving humans. All case reports of infectious osseous complications due to bone anchor use in female reconstructive procedures were also reviewed during this period.
RESULTS: Since the inception of bone anchor suture fixation for female pelvic reconstructive procedures 10 years ago, the overall prevalence of related infectious complications has been 6 cases in 1,018 procedures (0.6%). This type of adverse event developed between followup weeks 1 and 24. The prevalence of suprapubic bone anchors has been 6 cases in 698 procedures (0.86%). For transvaginal bone anchor procedures no infectious cases have been reported in the combined series of 314 procedures and the same is true for 1 reported case of sacral bone anchor placement in 6 procedures. No statistical difference was noted in regard to the prevalence of infection in procedures involving suprapubic bone anchors and transvaginal bone anchor combined with sacral bone anchor placement (Fisher's exact test p = 0.19). The organisms reported in case reports suggest a coliform, skin or hematogenous source for contamination of the bone anchor site.
CONCLUSIONS: An infectious bone anchor complication in female pelvic reconstructive procedures is an uncommon event with a reported prevalence of 0.6%. Currently there is no evidence of differences in the prevalence of osseous complications after transvaginal versus suprapubic bone anchor fixation. Preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics are recommended to decrease the potential of infectious bone anchor complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371895     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200106000-00032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Lessons from the past: directions for the future. Do new marketed surgical procedures and grafts produce ethical, personal liability, and legal concerns for physicians?

Authors:  Donald R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-16

Review 2.  Complications of anterior compartment vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Eric S Rovner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Bone-anchored suburethral sling: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Actinomyces meyeri osteomyelitis of the symphysis pubis following pubovaginal sling.

Authors:  Jaime B Long; Joseph M Collins; Christopher P Beauchamp; Rosanne Kho; Jeffrey L Cornella
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.