Literature DB >> 11371276

Shape and movement of the interatrial septum predicts change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.

C F Royse1, A G Royse, P F Soeding, D W Blake.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess whether movement of the interatrial septum predicts change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). In 71 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the interatrial septum was categorised by its shape and movement using transesophageal echocardiography. Fixed curvature (FC) was identified by bowing of the interatrial septum from left to right throughout the cardiac cycle, mid-systolic reversal (MSR) by minimal septal movement and transient reversal (right to left) during mid-systole, and mid-systolic buckling (MSB) by marked movement and buckling of the septum during mid-systole. These were compared with PCWP. Sensitivity and interobserver reliability was studied with continuous PCWP and TEE measurement during a period of acute volume alteration in 10 additional patients. Interatrial septal movement predicted PCWP, with mean PCWP (95% confidence intervals) for FC, 18.1 mmHg (16.7 to 19.6), MSR 13.2 mmHg (12.5 to 13.8) and MSB, 9.9 mmHg (9.0 to 10.7) mmHg. The mean PCWP at which a change in pattern occurred was 8.9 mmHg (8.3 to 9.6) for MSR to MSB, and 10.9 mmHg (10.1 to 11.8) for MSR to FC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in mean values for all three observers. Movement of the interatrial septum predicts change in PCWP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1341-1098            Impact factor:   1.520


  8 in total

1.  Interatrial septal motion as a novel index to predict left atrial pressure.

Authors:  Kumiko Masai; Hideyuki Kishima; Satoshi Takahashi; Kenki Ashida; Akiko Goda; Takanao Mine; Masanori Asakura; Masaharu Ishihara; Tohru Masuyama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  [Perioperative optimization using hemodynamically focused echocardiography in high-risk patients-A practice guide].

Authors:  R F Trauzeddel; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D A Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Perioperative echocardiography-guided hemodynamic therapy in high-risk patients: a practical expert approach of hemodynamically focused echocardiography.

Authors:  R F Trauzeddel; M Ertmer; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review.

Authors:  Justin C Mandeville; Claire L Colebourn
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-06

5.  Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) predicts poor outcome in patients undergoing acute pulmonary embolectomy.

Authors:  Eckhard Schmid; Jan N Hilberath; Gunnar Blumenstock; Prem S Shekar; Steffen Kling; Stanton K Shernan; Peter Rosenberger; Martina Nowak-Machen
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2015

6.  ASD device closure in pediatrics: 3-Dimensional transthoracic echocardiography perspective.

Authors:  Sonia A El-Saiedi; Hala M Agha; Mohamed F Shaltoot; Hayat H Nassar; Amal M El Sisi; Wael A Attia; Yasser M Sedky
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-26

7.  The impact of heart, lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound on prediction of failed extubation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a prospective observational pilot study.

Authors:  Kavi Haji; Darsim Haji; David J Canty; Alistair G Royse; Cameron Green; Colin F Royse
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2018-07-04

8.  Intraoperative TOE guided management of newly diagnosed severe tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension during orthotopic liver transplantation: a case report demonstrating the importance of reversibility as a favorable prognostic factor.

Authors:  B Pearce; R Hu; F Desmond; D Banyasz; R Jones; C O Tan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 2.217

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.