Literature DB >> 11371151

Neandertal energetics and foraging efficiency.

M V Sorensen1, W R Leonard.   

Abstract

Mechanical interpretations of Neandertal skeletal robusticity suggest extremely high activity levels compared to modern humans. Such activity patterns imply high energy requirements; yet it has been argued that Neandertals were also inefficient foragers. The present study addresses this apparent conflict by estimating energy needs in Neandertals and then evaluating those estimates in the context of energetic and foraging data compiled for contemporary human foragers and nonhuman primates. Energy demands for Neandertals were determined by first predicting basal metabolic rates (BMR) from body weight estimates using human standards developed by the World Health Organization [FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Export Committee, Geneva: WHO]. Total daily energy expenditure (kcal/day) was then estimated assuming high levels of physical activity (i.e., 2--3 x BMR), comparable to those observed among subsistence-level populations today. These estimates of energy requirements (ranging from 3000--5500 kcal/day) were then used to determine Neandertal foraging efficiency assuming (1) minimal survival-level foraging returns, and (2) daily foraging times longer than those observed among any contemporary foraging group and comparable to a nonhuman primate. Even with these extremely conservative parameters, estimates of Neandertal foraging efficiency (approximately 800--1150 kcal/h foraged) were comparable to those observed among living hunter-gatherers. These results indicate that if Neandertals did have heavy activity levels, as implied by their skeletal robusticity, they would have required foraging efficiencies within the range observed among modern groups. Thus, Neandertals could have been either highly active or poor foragers, but they could not have been both. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11371151     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2001.0472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  8 in total

Review 1.  Middle childhood and modern human origins.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thompson; Andrew J Nelson
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  The Impact of Early Human Migration on Brown Adipose Tissue Evolution and Its Relevance to the Modern Obesity Pandemic.

Authors:  Dyan Sellayah
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-12-18

Review 3.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Leptin and the systems neuroscience of meal size control.

Authors:  Harvey J Grill
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  An ecocultural model predicts Neanderthal extinction through competition with modern humans.

Authors:  William Gilpin; Marcus W Feldman; Kenichi Aoki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Neandertal humeri may reflect adaptation to scraping tasks, but not spear thrusting.

Authors:  Colin N Shaw; Cory L Hofmann; Michael D Petraglia; Jay T Stock; Jinger S Gottschall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ''reasonably close'' really close enough?

Authors:  Patricia Ann Kramer; Adam D Sylvester
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Neanderthals versus Modern Humans: Evidence for Resource Competition from Isotopic Modelling.

Authors:  Virginie Fabre; Silvana Condemi; Anna Degioanni; Estelle Herrscher
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.