Literature DB >> 11370991

Umbilical pyloromyotomy--an alternative to laparoscopy?

K R Shankar1, P D Losty, M O Jones, R R Turnock, G L Lamont, D A Lloyd.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the utility of umbilical pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) compared to published series promoting laparoscopy.
METHODS: Eighty-six babies with IHPS had pyloromyotomy using an umbilical skin fold incision. Operating times, post-operative hospital stay and cosmetic appearance of the umbilical wound were studied. Data extracted from recent series promoting laparoscopy were identified using a MEDLINE search strategy and used for comparative analysis.
RESULTS: Mean operating time for umbilical pyloromyotomy was 30 min (range 15-50 min). All patients went home at an average period of 58 h (range 48-72 h) following surgery. The umbilical scar was barely visible in the post-operative period. Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy operating times ranging from 18-41 min (mean overall 30 min) are recorded in the literature. Post-operative stay following laparoscopy has been variable (23-91 h), where reported. In contrast with umbilical pyloromyotomy, "pox" marks observed following port insertions for laparoscopy can give an unsightly scar.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has found that umbilical pyloromyotomy can be performed with minimal morbidity and equivalent operating times to laparoscopy. The shorter hospital stay reported in some series promoting laparoscopy must be balanced against local practice influencing hospital stay, the financial implications of offering a laparoscopic service, the skills needed for laparoscopy, and the short learning curve required by paediatric surgical trainees to become proficient at umbilical pyloromyotomy. The cosmesis of the umbilical incision is excellent. These findings suggest that umbilical pyloromyotomy is a reliable alternative to laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11370991     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-12189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0939-7248            Impact factor:   2.191


  4 in total

1.  Can pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis be performed in any hospital? Results from two teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Esther D van den Ende; Jan-Hein Allema; Frans W J Hazebroek; Paul J Breslau
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Jill Van Der Zee; Hock L Tan; Agostino Pierro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb; Casey M Calkins; J Patrick Murphy; Walter S Andrews; Ronald J Sharp; Charles L Snyder; Daniel J Ostlie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pediatric laparoscopy: Facts and factitious claims.

Authors:  V Raveenthiran
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.