Literature DB >> 11370970

Cooperation in the dark: signalling and collective action in quorum-sensing bacteria.

S P Brown1, R A Johnstone.   

Abstract

The study of quorum-sensing bacteria has revealed a widespread mechanism of coordinating bacterial gene expression with cell density. By monitoring a constitutively produced signal molecule, individual bacteria can limit their expression of group-beneficial phenotypes to cell densities that guarantee an effective group outcome. In this paper, we attempt to move away from a commonly expressed view that these impressive feats of coordination are examples of multicellularity in prokaryotic populations. Here, we look more closely at the individual conflict underlying this cooperation, illustrating that, even under significant levels of genetic conflict, signalling and resultant cooperative behaviour can stably exist. A predictive two-trait model of signal strength and of the extent of cooperation is developed as a function of relatedness (reflecting multiplicity of infection) and basic population demographic parameters. The model predicts that the strength of quorum signalling will increase as conflict (multiplicity of infecting strains) increases, as individuals attempt to coax more cooperative contributions from their competitors, leading to a devaluation of the signal as an indicator of density. Conversely, as genetic conflict increases, the model predicts that the threshold density for cooperation will increase and the subsequent strength of group cooperation will be depressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11370970      PMCID: PMC1088694          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  59 in total

1.  Cooperation, virulence and siderophore production in bacterial parasites.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of resistance to quorum quenching in digital organisms.

Authors:  Benjamin E Beckmann; David B Knoester; Brian D Connelly; Christopher M Waters; Philip K McKinley
Journal:  Artif Life       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 0.667

3.  Microbial secretor-cheater dynamics.

Authors:  Steven A Frank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Ake Brännström; Thilo Gross; Bernd Blasius; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Cooperation, clumping and the evolution of multicellularity.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal?

Authors:  Stephen P Diggle; Andy Gardner; Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations.

Authors:  Sophie E Darch; Stuart A West; Klaus Winzer; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Switching between apparently redundant iron-uptake mechanisms benefits bacteria in changeable environments.

Authors:  Zoé Dumas; Adin Ross-Gillespie; Rolf Kümmerli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Cell-cell communication in bacteria: united we stand.

Authors:  Susanne B von Bodman; Joanne M Willey; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies.

Authors:  Eric L Bruger; Christopher M Waters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.