Literature DB >> 11370872

The wild-type conformation of the Mos-1 inverted terminal repeats is suboptimal for transposition in bacteria.

C Augé-Gouillou1, M H Hamelin, M V Demattei, M Periquet, Y Bigot.   

Abstract

The two inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) flanking the Mos-1 mariner element differ in sequence at four positions. Gel retardation experiments indicated that each of these differences has a significant impact on the quality of the interaction between the ITR and the Mos-1 transposase. We showed that the transposase binds to the 3' ITR better than to the 5' ITR. The results of transposition assays performed in Escherichia coli indicated that these differences have an influence on the rate of transposition and the stability of the transposition products. Finally, we find that the wild-type configuration of the Mos-1 element, with one 5' ITR and one 3' ITR, is less efficient for transposition in bacteria than that of an element having two 3' ITRs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11370872     DOI: 10.1007/s004380000385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  28 in total

1.  DNA-binding activity and subunit interaction of the mariner transposase.

Authors:  L Zhang; A Dawson; D J Finnegan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  PIF- and Pong-like transposable elements: distribution, evolution and relationship with Tourist-like miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Ning Jiang; Cédric Feschotte; Susan R Wessler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Birth of a chimeric primate gene by capture of the transposase gene from a mobile element.

Authors:  Richard Cordaux; Swalpa Udit; Mark A Batzer; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Population genetics models of competition between transposable element subfamilies.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Applying mobile genetic elements for genome analysis and evolution.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Miller; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 6.  Mariner transposons as genetic tools in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  L Delaurière; B Chénais; Y Hardivillier; L Gauvry; N Casse
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  The bacterial Tn9 chloramphenicol resistance gene: an attractive DNA segment for Mos1 mariner insertions.

Authors:  Gwénaëlle Crénès; Dina Ivo; Joan Hérisson; Sarah Dion; Sylvaine Renault; Yves Bigot; Agnès Petit
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Internal deletions of transposable elements: the case of Lemi elements.

Authors:  Abdelhakime Negoua; Jacques-Deric Rouault; Mohamed Chakir; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Bias between the left and right inverted repeats during IS911 targeted insertion.

Authors:  P Rousseau; C Loot; C Turlan; S Nolivos; M Chandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Bacterial genetic methods to explore the biology of mariner transposons.

Authors:  David J Lampe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.