S B Thacker1, J Buffington. 1. Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. sbtl@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Critics argue that the modern epidemiologist seems more concerned with intricately modelling complex relationships among risk factors than understanding their origins and their implications for public health. Indeed, some contend that epidemiology has reached its limits as a discipline. To address such concerns, alternatives have been proposed that integrate biological, analytical, and social approaches to epidemiological practice and training. METHODS: The published literature was reviewed to examine critical issues in current epidemiological practice and training. In addition, we reviewed records of training programmes in applied epidemiology established in 20 countries. RESULTS: We describe an existing approach to preparing epidemiologists for the emerging challenges of public health in which epidemiological research and practice are applied toward the end of improving public health and health care. Training in applied epidemiology is based on a philosophy of 'learning while doing'. Under the supervision of an experienced epidemiologist, trainees conduct field investigations, analyse large data bases, evaluate surveillance systems, publish and present scientific research, and respond to public enquiries. More than 3000 people have received intensive formal training over the past 50 years in programmes in more than 20 countries; most graduates continued to use the tools of applied epidemiology in their work. CONCLUSION: Training in applied epidemiology anchors the discipline in population-based, relevant public health practice.
BACKGROUND: Critics argue that the modern epidemiologist seems more concerned with intricately modelling complex relationships among risk factors than understanding their origins and their implications for public health. Indeed, some contend that epidemiology has reached its limits as a discipline. To address such concerns, alternatives have been proposed that integrate biological, analytical, and social approaches to epidemiological practice and training. METHODS: The published literature was reviewed to examine critical issues in current epidemiological practice and training. In addition, we reviewed records of training programmes in applied epidemiology established in 20 countries. RESULTS: We describe an existing approach to preparing epidemiologists for the emerging challenges of public health in which epidemiological research and practice are applied toward the end of improving public health and health care. Training in applied epidemiology is based on a philosophy of 'learning while doing'. Under the supervision of an experienced epidemiologist, trainees conduct field investigations, analyse large data bases, evaluate surveillance systems, publish and present scientific research, and respond to public enquiries. More than 3000 people have received intensive formal training over the past 50 years in programmes in more than 20 countries; most graduates continued to use the tools of applied epidemiology in their work. CONCLUSION: Training in applied epidemiology anchors the discipline in population-based, relevant public health practice.
Authors: Carl Reddy; Lazarus Kuonza; Hetani Ngobeni; Natalie T Mayet; Timothy J Doyle; Seymour Williams Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Zeinab Gura Roka; Jane Githuku; Mark Obonyo; Waqo Boru; Tura Galgalo; Samuel Amwayi; Jackson Kioko; David Njoroge; James Anthony Ransom Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2017-10-24
Authors: Susan Fred Rumisha; Rogath Saika Kishimba; Ahmed Abade Mohamed; Loveness John Urio; Neema Rusibayamila; Muhammad Bakari; Janneth Mghamba Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2020-05-27