Literature DB >> 11369467

Graph use in psychology and other sciences.

L A. Best1, L D. Smith, D A. Stubbs.   

Abstract

Since the early 19th century, graphs have been recognised as an effective method of analysing and representing scientific data. However, levels of graph use have varied widely since then, partly due to increasing reliance on inferential statistics in some fields. Recent studies indicate that graph use is closely related to the 'hardness' of scientific disciplines, and that this finding holds for journal articles and textbooks across the subfields of psychology. In the area of animal behaviour, journals devote about one-sixth of their page space to graphs, a level of graph use approximating that of biology and physics. Implications for the training of scientists in the use of visual displays are considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11369467     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00156-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  4 in total

1.  An initial survey of fractional graph and table area in behavioral journals.

Authors:  Richard M Kubina; Douglas E Kostewicz; Shawn M Datchuk
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

2.  Progressing toward data intimacy: a review of within-session data analysis.

Authors:  Tara A Fahmie; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  "Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Less Is More: Psychologists Can Learn More by Studying Fewer People.

Authors:  Matthew P Normand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.