Literature DB >> 11369057

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) status in renal cell carcinoma patients with polysomy of chromosome 7.

P S Amare Kadam1, C Varghese, S H Bharde, N K Narasimhamoorthy, S Desai, S H Advani, R Havaldar, J N Kulkarni.   

Abstract

We investigated 40 cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to study the polysomy 7 status in papillary and clear-cell types (nonpapillary RCC) and relationship with clinical, pathological, and biological features such as grade, stage, tumor proliferation rate (PCNA expression) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) expression and thereby to understand the prognostic significance of polysomy 7 and EGFr expression. In a prospective study, chromosome 7 copy number was analyzed in tumor cells by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with an alpha-satellite DNA probe for chromosome 7. Both proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and EGFr expression were examined in paraffin sections by immunostaining. The relationship between clinicopathological and clinicobiological parameters was evaluated by appropriate statistical methods. Polysomy 7 was present in 100% of papillary and 56.2% of clear-cell types RCC. In clear-cell RCC, in comparison with polysomy 7-dominant (D) category (20-50% polysomy-7 cells), polysomy 7-major (M) category (>50% polysomy 7 cells) was associated with higher tumor grade (P = 0.05). Polysomy 7 was also correlated with stage of the disease (P = 0.006). The PCNA index ranged between 12.8-89.6% and was comparatively high in high-grade tumors (P = 0.001). The PCNA index was also correlated with polysomy 7 (P = 0.002), and the association was stronger in tumors with polysomy M versus polysomy D category (P = 0.02). The EGFr expression did not correlate with either grade, stage, PCNA, or polysomy 7. The correlation of polysomy 7 with less favorable prognostic factors such as higher tumor grade, stage, and higher proliferative index in the present study indicates that polysomy 7 might be used as a prognostic predictor in clear-cell RCC. Evaluation of clinical end points will confirm the prognostic potential of the genetic marker polysomy 7 in our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11369057     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(00)00375-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  5 in total

1.  EGFR kinase-dependent and kinase-independent roles in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Maria R Muroni; Francesca Sanges; Giovanni Sotgiu; Anna Asunis; Luciana Tanca; Daniela Onnis; Giovanna Pira; Alessandra Manca; Simone Dore; Maria G Uras; Sara Ena; Maria R De Miglio
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  RIN1 promotes renal cell carcinoma malignancy by activating EGFR signaling through Rab25.

Authors:  Zi-Hao Feng; Yong Fang; Liang-Yun Zhao; Jun Lu; Yong-Qian Wang; Zhen-Hua Chen; Yong Huang; Jin-Huan Wei; Yan-Ping Liang; Jun-Jie Cen; Yi-Hui Pan; Bing Liao; Wei Chen; Jun-Hang Luo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  Maslinic Acid Inhibits Proliferation of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines and Suppresses Angiogenesis of Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Parth Thakor; Wenzhe Song; Ramalingam B Subramanian; Vasudev R Thakkar; David A Vesey; Glenda C Gobe
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 4.  Metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert C Flanigan; Steven C Campbell; Joseph I Clark; Maria M Picken
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-10

Review 5.  Genetic and Chromosomal Aberrations and Their Clinical Significance in Renal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Ning Yi Yap; Retnagowri Rajandram; Keng Lim Ng; Jayalakshmi Pailoor; Ahmad Fadzli; Glenda Carolyn Gobe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.