Literature DB >> 11368282

Vaccines without thiomersal: why so necessary, why so long coming?

A J van't Veen1.   

Abstract

The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature. The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children. The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance. In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children's exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal. In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11368282     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  55 in total

1.  Allergy to non-toxoid constituents of vaccines and implications for patch testing.

Authors:  N H Cox; C Moss; A Forsyth
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren.

Authors:  M A Barros; A Baptista; T M Correia; F Azevedo
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Sensitivity to thimerosal and photosensitivity to piroxicam.

Authors:  J L de Castro; J P Freitas; F M Brandão; R Themido
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Delayed hypersensitivity to thimerosal in RhO(D) immunoglobulin.

Authors:  R E Luka; J J Oppenheimer; N Miller; J Rossi; L Bielory
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Systemic contact dermatitis from thimerosal.

Authors:  P Zenarola; A Gimma; M Lomuto
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Thimerosal-induced bullous contact dermatitis.

Authors:  A Zemtsov; G G Bolton
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Contact sensitization in children.

Authors:  B M Manzini; G Ferdani; V Simonetti; M Donini; S Seidenari
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  [Reactions to vaccinations against tetanus and tick-borne encephalitis caused by merthiolate (thiomersal)].

Authors:  H Lindemayr; M Drobil; H Ebner
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 0.751

9.  Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Seidenari; B M Manzini; P Danese; A Motolese
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  A probable role for vaccines containing thimerosal in thimerosal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J Osawa; K Kitamura; Z Ikezawa; H Nakajima
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies in treating severe contact dermatitis in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Luz S Fonacier; Marcella R Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Positive patch test for mercury possibly from exposure to amalgam.

Authors:  Tomio Mori; Kazuhiro Sato; Yukinori Kusaka; Toshiko Ido; Masanobu Kumagiri; Toshiyuki Ogasawara; Kazuo Sano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 3.  Thiomersal in vaccines: balancing the risk of adverse effects with the risk of vaccine-preventable disease.

Authors:  Mark Bigham; Ray Copes
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Neurotoxicity of organomercurial compounds.

Authors:  Coral Sanfeliu; Jordi Sebastià; Rosa Cristòfol; Eduard Rodríguez-Farré
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.