OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate cut-off points of waist circumference, body mass index and waist to hip ratio with respect to their ability to predict other individual and multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional surveys. SUBJECTS: A total of 9913 men and women aged 18-74, selected using health insurance registries from five Canadian provinces. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric measures, other cardiovascular risk factors, receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: : Waist circumference may be the best single indicator of other individual and multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Optimal cut-off points of all anthropometric measures are dependent on age, sex and the prevalence of the risk factor(s) being considered. For waist circumference, cut-off points of > or =90 cm in men and > or =80 cm in women may be most appropriate for prediction of individual and multiple risk factors in Caucasian populations. CONCLUSION: Health professionals should incorporate the use of waist circumference measurements in their routine clinical examination of adult patients.
OBJECTIVE: To comparatively evaluate cut-off points of waist circumference, body mass index and waist to hip ratio with respect to their ability to predict other individual and multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional surveys. SUBJECTS: A total of 9913 men and women aged 18-74, selected using health insurance registries from five Canadian provinces. MEASUREMENTS: Anthropometric measures, other cardiovascular risk factors, receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS: : Waist circumference may be the best single indicator of other individual and multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Optimal cut-off points of all anthropometric measures are dependent on age, sex and the prevalence of the risk factor(s) being considered. For waist circumference, cut-off points of > or =90 cm in men and > or =80 cm in women may be most appropriate for prediction of individual and multiple risk factors in Caucasian populations. CONCLUSION: Health professionals should incorporate the use of waist circumference measurements in their routine clinical examination of adult patients.
Authors: Henrike Rianne Joanna Cornelie Ravensbergen; Scott Alexander Lear; Victoria Elizabeth Claydon Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Navin Suthahar; Wouter C Meijers; Jennifer E Ho; Ron T Gansevoort; Adriaan A Voors; Peter van der Meer; Stephan J L Bakker; Stephane Heymans; Vanessa van Empel; Blanche Schroen; Pim van der Harst; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Rudolf A de Boer Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Carolyn S Hall; Jessica Bowman Bauldry; Mandar Karhade; Lily M Valad; Henry M Kuerer; Sarah M DeSnyder; Carlos H Barcenas; Anthony Lucci Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 2.565