Literature DB >> 11359887

A comparison of radiographic foot measurements taken in two different positions.

J A Bryant1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain if positioning of the feet for radiographic assessment produces significant variations in measured angles, and if measurements taken from radiographs taken on two separate occasions are reproducible. Weightbearing x-rays were taken of both feet of ten male healthy subjects in two standardized positions: 1) the angle and base of gait and 2) the feet together and straight-ahead positions. The radiographs were repeated 2 weeks later. The results failed to demonstrate significant differences of radiographic measurements between the two specific foot-positioning methods. No significant differences were found between radiographic measurements of normal feet taken on different occasions. A strong correlation of the repeated measures suggests that weightbearing foot radiographs can be reliably reproduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359887     DOI: 10.7547/87507315-91-5-234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  6 in total

1.  Osteogenic relationship between the lateral plantar process and the peroneal tubercle in the human calcaneus.

Authors:  Corey M Gill; Atul K Taneja; Miriam A Bredella; Martin Torriani; Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Radiographic evaluation of calcaneal fractures: to measure or not to measure.

Authors:  T Schepers; A Z Ginai; P G H Mulder; P Patka
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Footprint as an alternative to X-ray in hallux valgus angle measurement.

Authors:  Ensieh Pourhoseingholi; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Azam Bagheri; Elham Esfandiar; Morteza Saeb
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-06-20

Review 4.  Tarsometatarsal bone remodelling after subtalar arthroereisis.

Authors:  Matthias Braito; Maria Radlwimmer; Dietmar Dammerer; Philipp Hofer-Picout; Jürgen Wansch; Rainer Biedermann
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Prediction of peak pressure from clinical and radiological measurements in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  A comparison of hallux valgus angles assessed with computerised plantar pressure measurements, clinical examination and radiography in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Daniël Mc Janssen; Antal P Sanders; Nick A Guldemond; Joris Hermus; Geert Him Walenkamp; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 2.303

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.