Literature DB >> 11359319

Anaesthesia for caesarean section.

M R Dresner1, J M Freeman.   

Abstract

Quality and choice in anaesthesia for caesarean section have significantly improved over the last two decades. During this time, general anaesthesia usage has decreased to the point where, in some centres, it is an occasionally used technique for severe fetal distress. This change in practice may have been responsible for the fall in anaesthetic deaths in pregnant women that has occurred over the same period. The boom in regional anaesthesia has improved the aesthetics of childbirth by caesarean section, women's peri-operative comfort, and post-operative analgesia. It has, however, introduced new problems, such as delays in inducing anaesthesia in emergency situations, post-operative immobility and urinary retention. The increase in anaesthetic choices has led to inconsistencies in practice between individual anaesthetists, and between regions and nations. It is therefore impossible for obstetricians to make assumptions about the impact of anaesthesia on their patients. Where possible, anaesthetic protocols and guidelines should exist in every centre, with obstetricians clearly informed of relevant features. Such an approach will prevent inconsistent advice being given to patients and dangerous mistakes occurring. With every aspect of maternity care, a multidisciplinary team approach is in patients' best interests, and anaesthesia for caesarean section is no exception. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359319     DOI: 10.1053/beog.2000.0153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  6 in total

1.  Retrospective Evaluation of Anaesthetic Techniques for Caesarean.

Authors:  Melek Aksoy Sarı; Semih Küçükgüçlü; Şule Özbilgin; Ferim Sakize Günenç; Sümeyye Mercan; Ayşenur Esen; Büşra Yetim
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between General and Spinal Anaesthesia in Emergency Caesarean Deliveries.

Authors:  Arzu Açıkel; Tülün Öztürk; Aslı Göker; Gonca Gül Hayran; Gönül Tezcan Keleş
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Type, management, and associated factors of failed spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zenebe Bekele; Hunduma Jisha
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  The role of the post-anaesthesia care unit in the management of high-risk obstetric patients.

Authors:  Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Konstantinos Kalimeris; Aggeliki Pandazi; George Salamalekis; Charalampos Chrelias; Paraskevi Matsota
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.318

5.  Comparison of the Effect of Bupivacaine in Combination with Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine Plus Placebo on Neonatal Apgar Score, Bispectral Index, and Sedation Level of Parturient Women.

Authors:  Houman Teymourian; Shayesteh Khorasanizadeh; Padideh Ansar; Leila Nazari; Masih Ebrahimy Dehkordy
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-10-24

6.  The trends of obstetric anesthesia practice: In a tertiary care center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshabibi; Azza M Madkhali; Amer A Alkinani; Ali A Alyami; Abdulaleem Alatassi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-09-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.