Literature DB >> 11359307

Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study.

P I Brånemark1, P Engstrand, L O Ohrnell, K Gröndahl, P Nilsson, K Hagberg, C Darle, U Lekholm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brånemark fixtures were originally prescribed to be placed in two surgical stages. During the past years, reports on the placement of machined titanium implants in a one-stage procedure have been published, and the results have been encouraging. Recently there has been considerable interest in early or immediate loading.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to report the preliminary clinical results of a new method for implant treatment of the edentulous mandible. The new protocol involves prefabricated components and surgical guides, elimination of the prosthetic impression procedure and attachment of the permanent fixed bridge on the day of implant placement.
METHODS: Fifty patients (26 males, 24 females) received 150 Brånemark Novum implants and were followed from 6 months to 3 years after implant placement. Bone width and height were determined preoperatively with the use of radiographs. The jaw was reduced in height to accommodate three special 5-mm wide implants. Precise implant positioning was accomplished with special drilling templates. Drill guides were placed over the drilling templates during site preparation using a series of specially designed drills. After the mucosa had been sutured back into position, a prefabricated titanium lower bar was connected with titanium screws to the transmucosal fixture. Another titanium bar was then attached by the prosthodontist, and a bite registration was performed. The bridge was attached to the upper bar. The permanent reconstruction was provided to the patient later the same day.
RESULTS: Three implants were lost to follow-up and three failed, resulting in an overall survival rate of 98%. One prosthesis failed, leaving a prosthetic survival rate of 98%. The average treatment time was approximately 7 hours. At the baseline examination, the marginal bone level was 0.72 mm below the reference point. The average marginal bone loss was 0.2 mm per year and 0.26 mm between the 3-month and 1-year control visits. The accumulated mean bone loss, including baseline, was -1.25 mm. A patient questionnaire demonstrated that 94% of the patients did not experience any discomfort during treatment and all patients would recommend the procedure to others.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the precise surgical and prosthetic protocol allows successful prosthetic rehabilitation of mandibular edentulism and that the permanent reconstruction can be provided to the patient on the day of fixture surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11359307     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00086.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  23 in total

1.  Magnetoelastic vibrational biomaterials for real-time monitoring and modulation of the host response.

Authors:  E Vlaisavljevich; H R Holmes; E L Tan; Z Qian; S Trierweiler; K G Ong; R M Rajachar
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Hassan Maghaireh; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

3.  The use of light/chemically hardened polymethylmethacrylate, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, and calcium hydroxide graft material in combination with polyanhydride around implants in minipigs: part I: immediate stability and function.

Authors:  Hatice Hasturk; Alpdogan Kantarci; Mazen Ghattas; Marcella Schmidt; Russell A Giordano; Arthur Ashman; Thomas G Diekwisch; Thomas Van Dyke
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Protocol for mandibular reconstruction with zygomatic implants (zygomatic mandibular implant).

Authors:  Ruben Muñoz; Golaszewski Gajos; Jose Bladimir; Diaz Carvajal; Alvaro Luis; Grace Del Valle Speranza
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-28

5.  Release of bone markers in immediately loaded and nonloaded dental implants: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  A J Prati; M Z Casati; F V Ribeiro; F R Cirano; G P Pastore; S P Pimentel; R C V Casarin
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  A clinical study on the 6-year outcomes of immediately loaded three implants for completely edentulous mandibles: "the all-on-3 concept".

Authors:  Mustafa Ayna; Keyvan Sagheb; Ralf Gutwald; Henning Wieker; Christian Flörke; Yahya Açil; Jörg Wiltfang; Aydin Gülses
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  A Study of Human Mandibles of Indian Origin for Available Bone After Bone Reduction for Trefoil Concept: A In-Vitro Human Cadaver Mandible Study.

Authors:  R Chowdhary; S Amber; N K Sonahalli
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-08-05

Review 8.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

9.  Engineered protein coatings to improve the osseointegration of dental and orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Jordan Raphel; Johan Karlsson; Silvia Galli; Ann Wennerberg; Christopher Lindsay; Matthew G Haugh; Jukka Pajarinen; Stuart B Goodman; Ryo Jimbo; Martin Andersson; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  A comparative analysis of periimplant bone levels of immediate and conventionally loaded implants.

Authors:  G K Thapliyal; V R Pawar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.