Literature DB >> 11358609

Group size and perching behaviour in young domestic fowl.

R C. Newberry1, I Estevez, L J. Keeling.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that young domestic fowl perform less perch-related antipredator behaviour with increasing group size, White Leghorn pullets were reared in four replicate groups of 15, 30, 60 and 120 at a constant density of 5 birds/m(2). Each pen contained perches 20, 40 and 60cm above the ground. Perch space per bird per perch level was the same for all groups. It was predicted that, with increasing group size, domestic fowl would (1) spend less time on perches (i.e. more time down on the floor); (2) be less vigilant while perching; (3) spend relatively more time preening down on the floor. As predicted, the proportion of 3- to 18-week-old birds roosting on perches during scans throughout the photoperiod decreased with increasing group size, from 41+/-1.7% in groups of 15 birds to 33+/-1.6% in groups of 120 birds. This effect was due to reduced use of the lower perches; use of the highest perches was high at all group sizes. The proportion of birds vigilant on the highest perches of those present on that perch level decreased with increasing group size. The proportion of birds engaged in the vulnerable activity of preening down on the floor increased with group size. The frequency of transitions between floor and perches was not affected by group size but birds received more disturbances from other birds when on the top perch level in the larger groups. Thus, the decline in vigilance on the top perch level with increasing group size was not due to reduced disturbance from other birds. In conclusion, despite domestication and protection from non-human predators, changes in the use of perches by young domestic fowl with increasing group size were consistent with the antipredator hypothesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11358609     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00135-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  17 in total

1.  General behaviors and perching behaviors of laying hens in cages with different colored perches.

Authors:  D H Chen; J Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 2.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens.

Authors:  Andrew M Janczak; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of a partially perforated flooring system on animal-based welfare indicators in broiler housing.

Authors:  C Adler; I Tiemann; S Hillemacher; A J Schmithausen; U Müller; S Heitmann; B Spindler; N Kemper; W Büscher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Rearing experience with ramps improves specific learning and behaviour and welfare on a commercial laying farm.

Authors:  Kate I Norman; Claire A Weeks; John F Tarlton; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Multiple behavioural, morphological and cognitive developmental changes arise from a single alteration to early life spatial environment, resulting in fitness consequences for released pheasants.

Authors:  Mark A Whiteside; Rufus Sage; Joah R Madden
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Environmental complexity: A buffer against stress in the domestic chick.

Authors:  Irene Campderrich; Franco Nicolas Nazar; Anette Wichman; Raul Hector Marin; Inma Estevez; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system.

Authors:  Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Influence of later exposure to perches and nests on flock level distribution of hens in an aviary system during lay.

Authors:  S S MacLachlan; A B A Ali; M J Toscano; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.