Literature DB >> 11357556

Psychosocial assessment of living organ donors: clinical and ethical considerations.

M E Olbrisch1, S M Benedict, D L Haller, J L Levenson.   

Abstract

This article outlines psychosocial and ethical issues to be considered when evaluating potential living organ donors. Six types of living donors are described: genetically related, emotionally related, "Good Samaritan" (both directed and nondirected), vendors, and organ exchangers. The primary domains to be assessed in the psychosocial evaluation are informed consent, motivation for donating and the decision-making process, adequacy of support (financial and social), behavioral and psychological health, and the donor-recipient relationship. Obstacles to the evaluation process include impression management, overt deception, minimization of behavioral risk factors, and cultural and language differences between the donor and the evaluator. Ethical concerns, such as the right to donate, donor autonomy, freedom from coercion, nonmaleficence and beneficence in donor selection, conflicts of interest, "reasonable" risks to donors, and recipient decision making are also explored. To fully evaluate living organ donation, studying psychosocial as well as medical outcomes is crucial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11357556     DOI: 10.1177/152692480101100107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.065


  14 in total

1.  Psychosocial evaluation of candidates for living related kidney donation.

Authors:  Kimberly Sterner; Nataliya Zelikovsky; Cynthia Green; Bernard S Kaplan
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Factors associated with completion of pre-kidney transplant evaluations.

Authors:  Eric Siskind; Asha Alex; Mohini Alexander; Meredith Akerman; Christine Mathew; Lara Fishbane; Jisha Thomas; Ezra Israel; Melissa Fana; Cory Evans; Andrew Godwin; Stergiani Agorastos; Barbara Mellace; Jesus Rosado; Prejith P Rajendran; Prathik Krishnan; Poornima Ramadas; Antonette Flecha; Lisa Kiernan; Ruth M Morgan; Nicole Ali; Mala Sachdeva; Kellie Calderon; Susana Hong; Jasmeet Kaur; Amit Basu; Jeffrey Nicastro; Gene Coppa; Madhu Bhaskaran; Ernesto Molmenti
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-03

3.  Individual differences in personality profiles among potential living kidney transplant donors.

Authors:  Carlos J van-der Hofstadt; Jesús Rodríguez-Marín; Fermín Martínez-Zaragoza; Carlos de Santiago-Guervós
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2013-12-31

4.  Preventive intervention for living donor psychosocial outcomes: feasibility and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A Dew; A F DiMartini; A J DeVito Dabbs; A Zuckoff; H P Tan; M L McNulty; G E Switzer; K R Fox; J B Greenhouse; A Humar
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Supplementing living kidney transplantees' medical records with donor- and recipient-narratives.

Authors:  Anne Hambro Alnæs
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-12

6.  Ethical issues regarding related and nonrelated living organ donors.

Authors:  Giuliano Testa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Prevention of poor psychosocial outcomes in living organ donors: from description to theory-driven intervention development and initial feasibility testing.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Allan Zuckoff; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Mary L McNulty; Kristen R Fox; Galen E Switzer; Abhinav Humar; Henkie P Tan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.187

8.  Organ transplantation and meaning of life: the quest for self fulfilment.

Authors:  Jacques Quintin
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

Review 9.  Ethical analysis of living organ donation.

Authors:  Benita J Walton-Moss; Laura Taylor; Marie T Nolan
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.065

10.  Does incentivising pill-taking 'crowd out' risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment.

Authors:  Eleni Mantzari; Florian Vogt; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.