Literature DB >> 11357249

Mass population screening for colorectal cancer: factors influencing subjects' choice of screening test.

E Frew1, J Wolstenholme, D Whynes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify socio-demographic, economic, medical and attitudinal factors that explain subjects' choice of test for screening for colorectal cancer (biennial faecal occult blood test versus once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy).
METHODS: Data obtained from a questionnaire, administered by general practitioners and returned by approximately 2700 asymptomatic subjects. Thereafter, logistic regression modelling to explain willingness to participate in screening, whether or not a test preference is expressed, and the nature of the preference.
RESULTS: An interest in undertaking screening is more probable if the subject is white, older, married and possesses a high health motivation. An intention to participate is more probable if the subjects are particularly worried about the disease, feel themselves to be particularly susceptible to it, and have already had experience of screening for colorectal and (if female) other cancers. Persons in receipt of a household income below 10,000 Pounds are less likely to express an interest in screening. Women are more likely to express a test preference and this preference is more likely to be for the faecal occult blood test. Subjects' worries and perception of risk are associated with reported experiences of cancer, stomach problems and depression. A positive attitude towards screening is positively associated with frequency of dental visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Socio-demographic, economic and other factors evidently influence subjects' preferences for particular screening tests and, by implication, the likelihood of compliance with any future screening offer. The models support the view that participation in colorectal cancer screening has as much to do with a positive attitude towards health and health promotion generally as with any specific concern about the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11357249     DOI: 10.1258/1355819011927279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  5 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; S Elizabeth McGregor; Gillian Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Informed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population.

Authors:  Navkiran K Shokar; Carol A Carlson; Susan C Weller
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luis Bujanda; Cristina Sarasqueta; Leire Zubiaurre; Angel Cosme; Carmen Muñoz; Araceli Sánchez; Cristina Martín; Llucia Tito; Virginia Piñol; Antoni Castells; Xavier Llor; Rosa M Xicola; Elisenda Pons; Juan Clofent; María L de Castro; Jaime Cuquerella; Enrique Medina; Ana Gutierrez; Juan I Arenas; Rodrigo Jover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Karen Kelly-Blake; Ananda Sen; Sarah T Hawley; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.