Literature DB >> 11356750

Healthy city projects in developing countries: the first evaluation.

T Harpham1, S Burton, I Blue.   

Abstract

The 'healthy city' concept has only recently been adopted in developing countries. From 1995 to 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, supported healthy city projects (HCPs) in Cox's Bazar (Bangladesh), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Fayoum (Egypt), Managua (Nicaragua) and Quetta (Pakistan). The authors evaluated four of these projects, representing the first major evaluation of HCPs in developing countries. Methods used were stakeholder analysis, workshops, document analysis and interviews with 102 managers/implementers and 103 intended beneficiaries. Municipal health plan development (one of the main components of the healthy city strategy) in these cities was limited, which is a similar finding to evaluations of HCPs in Europe. The main activities selected by the projects were awareness raising and environmental improvements, particularly solid waste disposal. Two of the cities effectively used the 'settings' approach of the healthy city concept, whereby places such as markets and schools are targeted. The evaluation found that stakeholder involvement varied in relation to: (i) the level of knowledge of the project; (ii) the project office location; (iii) the project management structure; and (iv) type of activities (ranging from low stakeholder involvement in capital-intensive infrastructure projects, to high in some settings-type activities). There was evidence to suggest that understanding of environment-health links was increased across stakeholders. There was limited political commitment to the healthy city projects, perhaps due to the fact that most of the municipalities had not requested the projects. Consequently, the projects had little influence on written/expressed municipal policies. Some of the projects mobilized considerable resources, and most projects achieved effective intersectoral collaboration. WHO support enabled the project coordinators to network at national and international levels, and the capacity of these individuals (although not necessarily their institutions) was increased by the project. The average annual running cost of the projects was approximately 132,000 US dollars per city, which is close to the costs of the only other HCP for which a cost analysis has been undertaken, Bangkok (115,000 US dollars per year) Recommendations for these and other HCPs are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11356750     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/16.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  17 in total

1.  Improving city health: how can we tell?

Authors:  David Sharp
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Health disparities among the western, central and eastern rural regions of China after a decade of health promotion and disease prevention programming.

Authors:  Xi-Fan Zhang; Xiang-Yang Tian; Yu-Lan Cheng; Zhan-Chun Feng; Liang Wang; Jodi Southerland
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-31

3.  Impact of the China Healthy Cities Initiative on Urban Environment.

Authors:  Dahai Yue; Shiman Ruan; Jin Xu; Weiming Zhu; Luyu Zhang; Gang Cheng; Qingyue Meng
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Examining smoke-free coalitions in Armenia and Georgia: baseline community capacity.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Ana Dekanosidze; Arevik Torosyan; Lilit Grigoryan; Zhanna Sargsyan; Varduhi Hayrumyan; Marina Topuridze; Lela Sturua; Arusyak Harutyunyan; Lela Kvachantiradze; Nino Maglakelidze; Amiran Gamkrelidze; Romela Abovyan; Alexander Bazarchyan; Michelle C Kegler
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century.

Authors:  Yvonne Rydin; Ana Bleahu; Michael Davies; Julio D Dávila; Sharon Friel; Giovanni De Grandis; Nora Groce; Pedro C Hallal; Ian Hamilton; Philippa Howden-Chapman; Ka-Man Lai; C J Lim; Juliana Martins; David Osrin; Ian Ridley; Ian Scott; Myfanwy Taylor; Paul Wilkinson; James Wilson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Cash transfer and microfinance interventions for tuberculosis control: review of the impact evidence and policy implications.

Authors:  D Boccia; J Hargreaves; K Lönnroth; E Jaramillo; J Weiss; M Uplekar; J D H Porter; C A Evans
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Neglected diseases of neglected populations: thinking to reshape the determinants of health in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Authors:  John P Ehrenberg; Steven K Ault
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The ecosystem approach to health is a promising strategy in international development: lessons from Japan and Laos.

Authors:  Takashi Asakura; Hein Mallee; Sachi Tomokawa; Kazuhiko Moji; Jun Kobayashi
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.185

9.  The Beneficial Evaluation of the Healthy City Construction in China.

Authors:  Yuming Wang; Xinxin Wang; Fangxia Guan
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  Health-seeking behaviour in the city of Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo: results from a cross-sectional household survey.

Authors:  Mukalenge F Chenge; Jean Van der Vennet; Numbi O Luboya; Veerle Vanlerberghe; Mala A Mapatano; Bart Criel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.