Literature DB >> 11356728

Re-evaluation of a randomized controlled trial of antibiotics for minor respiratory illness in general practice.

T Fahey1, J Howie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A systematic review examining the efficacy of antibiotics in acute respiratory illness concluded that antibiotics are of little benefit. However, that review was based on analysis of only six randomized controlled trials, one of which was excluded because its analysis included patients with multiple episodes of illness; treatment group, either antibiotic or placebo, might have confounded the likelihood of suffering a subsequent episode of illness.
METHODS: This previously excluded randomized controlled trial of 301 patients with symptoms of minor respiratory illness was re-analysed to examine the efficacy of antibiotic versus placebo in terms of resolution of symptoms, most particularly cough.
RESULTS: Antibiotic had no impact on the resolution of symptoms of cough at 1 and 2 weeks, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7--2.1] and 0.8 (95% CI 0.4--1.6). In those 220 (73%) individuals who suffered a cough, 48 (44%) and 19 (17%) of patients taking placebo were still coughing after 1 and 2 weeks, respectively.
CONCLUSION: It appears that an antibiotic is likely to have, at best, a marginal impact on resolution of symptoms for most patients with minor respiratory illness in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11356728     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/18.3.246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic labelling as determinant of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract episodes in general practice.

Authors:  Huug J van Duijn; Marijke M Kuyvenhoven; Hanneke M Tiebosch; François G Schellevis; Theo J M Verheij
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.