Literature DB >> 11356503

Multiple brain-memory systems: the whole does not equal the sum of its parts.

J J Kim1, M G Baxter.   

Abstract

Most contemporary theories of memory are based on the assumption that memory can be divided into multiple psychological systems that are subserved by different neural substrates and that contribute to performance in a relatively independent manner. Although the study of individual memory systems has proved to be enormously useful, recent data increasingly point towards complex interactions between memory systems during performance of any given memory task. Three basic classes of interactions between different memory systems (competition, synergism and independence) are presented that appear to be congruent with the findings of many behavioral studies. Consideration of interactions among multiple memory systems will enhance our current understanding of memory by encouraging the view that memory systems are dynamic interactive units, rather than independent modules that act in isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11356503     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01818-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  35 in total

1.  The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning.

Authors:  Raddy Ramos; Lisa M Savage
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Against memory systems.

Authors:  David Gaffan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Neural changes when actions change: adaptation of strong and weak expectations.

Authors:  Anne-Marike Schiffer; Christiane Ahlheim; Kirstin Ulrichs; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The interplay of cognition and cooperation.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Lucie Salwiczek; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A computational model of parallel navigation systems in rodents.

Authors:  Ricardo Chavarriaga; Thomas Strösslin; Denis Sheynikhovich; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2005

6.  A different recruitment of the lateral and basolateral amygdala promotes contextual or elemental conditioned association in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Ludovic Calandreau; Aline Desmedt; Laurence Decorte; Robert Jaffard
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Hippocampal-prefrontal dynamics in spatial working memory: interactions and independent parallel processing.

Authors:  John C Churchwell; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors couple to multiple G-proteins to activate diverse intracellular signaling pathways in mouse hippocampus: role in neuronal excitability and associative learning.

Authors:  Thomas Blank; Ingrid Nijholt; Dimitris K Grammatopoulos; Harpal S Randeva; Edward W Hillhouse; Joachim Spiess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Head west or left, east or right: interactions between memory systems in neurocognitive aging.

Authors:  Inês Tomás Pereira; Michela Gallagher; Peter R Rapp
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.673

10.  Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus subserve different components of working memory in rats.

Authors:  Taejib Yoon; Jeffrey Okada; Min W Jung; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.