Literature DB >> 11356290

How do miniature pigs discriminate between people?. Discrimination between people wearing coveralls of the same colour.

Y Koba1, H Tanida.   

Abstract

Seven experiments were conducted on four miniature pigs to determine: (1) whether the pigs can discriminate between people wearing the same coloured clothing; (2) what cues they rely on if they could discriminate. For 2 weeks before the experiments began, the pigs were conditioned in a Y-maze to receive raisins from the rewarder wearing dark blue coveralls. They were then given the opportunity to choose the rewarder or non-rewarder in these experiments. Each session consisted of 20 trials. Successful discrimination was that the pig chose the rewarder at least 15 times in 20 trials (P<0.05: by chi(2)-test). In Experiment 1, both rewarder and non-rewarder wore dark blue coveralls. By 20 sessions, all pigs successfully identified the rewarder. In Experiment 2: (1) both wore coveralls of the same new colours or (2) one of them wore coveralls of new colours. They significantly preferred the rewarder even though the rewarder and/or non-rewarder wore coveralls of new colours. In Experiment 3, both wore dark blue coveralls but olfactory cues were obscured and auditory cues were not given. The pigs were able to identify the rewarder successfully irrespective of changing auditory and olfactory cues. In Experiment 4, both wore dark blue coveralls but covered part of their face and body in different ways. The correct response rate decreased when a part of the face and the whole body of the rewarder and non-rewarder were covered. In Experiment 5, both wore dark blue coveralls and changed their apparent body size by shifting sitting position. The correct response rate increased as the difference in body size between the experimenters increased. In Experiment 6, the distance between the experimenters and the pig was increased by 30cm increments. The correct response rate of each pig decreased as the experimenters receded from the pig, but performance varied among the pigs. In Experiment 7, the light intensity of the experimental room was reduced from 550 to 80lx and then to 20lx. The correct response rate of each pig decreased with the reduction in light intensity, but all the pigs discriminated the rewarder from the non-rewarder significantly even at 20lx.In conclusion, the pigs were able to discriminate between people wearing coveralls of the same colour after sufficient reinforcement. These results indicate that pigs are capable of using visual cues to discriminate between people.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11356290     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00106-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cognition and the human-animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans.

Authors:  Plotine Jardat; Léa Lansade
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Emotion Recognition in Cats.

Authors:  Angelo Quaranta; Serenella d'Ingeo; Rosaria Amoruso; Marcello Siniscalchi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Dog alerting and/or responding to epileptic seizures: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amélie Catala; Hugo Cousillas; Martine Hausberger; Marine Grandgeorge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics.

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; Jan Langbein; Marjorie Coulon; Vivian Gabor; Susann Oesterwind; Judith Benz-Schwarzburg; Eberhard von Borell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-12

5.  Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape.

Authors:  Franz Johann; Markus Handschuh; Peter Linderoth; Carsten F Dormann; Janosch Arnold
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Rapid cohort generation and analysis of disease spectrum of large animal model of cone dystrophy.

Authors:  Corinne Kostic; Simon Geoffrey Lillico; Sylvain Vincent Crippa; Nicolas Grandchamp; Héloïse Pilet; Stéphanie Philippe; Zen Lu; Tim James King; Jacques Mallet; Chamsy Sarkis; Yvan Arsenijevic; Christopher Bruce Alexander Whitelaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Pig Olfactory Brain: A Primer.

Authors:  Peter C Brunjes; Sanford Feldman; Stephen K Osterberg
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 8.  How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport.

Authors:  Temple Grandin; Chelsey Shivley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The Effect of Extensive Human Presence at an Early Age on Stress Responses and Reactivity of Juvenile Ostriches towards Humans.

Authors:  Pfunzo T Muvhali; Maud Bonato; Anel Engelbrecht; Irek A Malecki; Denise Hough; Jane E Robinson; Neil P Evans; Schalk W P Cloete
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Cheetahs discriminate familiar and unfamiliar human voices.

Authors:  Maël Leroux; Robyn Shelia Hetem; Martine Hausberger; Alban Lemasson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.