Literature DB >> 11355325

Carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring of response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

W S Wang1, J K Lin, T C Lin, T J Chiou, J H Liu, F S Fan, C C Yen, W S Chen, J K Jiang, S H Yang, H S Wang, P M Chen.   

Abstract

The response to chemotherapy of solid tumors is generally assessed by measuring tumors visualized by imaging. However, the response assessment based on imaging is not always feasible because patients often have disease not measurable by imaging, such as diffuse peritoneal dissemination. We evaluated the correlation between the change on imaging and change in CEA levels for assessing chemotherapeutic response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Between July 1993 and August 1999 we retrospectively examined 136 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, all of whom had measurable lesions. Forty patients received oral tegafur-uracil (300 mg/m2/day) plus folinic acid (60 mg/day) for 4 weeks, repeated every 5 weeks, as the firstline treatment. Another 96 patients received either a weekly intravenous bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) plus folinic acid (20 mg/m2), or an intravenous bolus injection of 5-fluorouracil (425 mg/m2) plus folinic acid (20 mg/m2) for 5 consecutive days every month. Responders, based on CEA assessment, were defined as those with a greater than 50% drop in CEA level for more than 4 weeks. The pretreatment CEA levels were elevated beyond the normal cutoff value in 110 (81%) patients. A response rate of 18.4% (95% CI, 11.9-24.9%), including 8 complete remissions and 17 partial remissions, was achieved according to imaging studies. The response rate assessed by CEA was 25% (34/136). Sixteen responders (47%) based on CEA had no remission on imaging. The sensitivity of change in CEA levels in the prediction of true responders and progressive diseases on imaging were 72% and 81%, respectively. In terms of the positive predictive value, change in CEA levels in the prediction of true responders and progressive disease on imaging were 53% and 85%, respectively. Patients with remarkable falls on CEA levels survived significantly longer than nonresponders (P < 0.001, log-rank test). At follow-up of 48 months the median survival for responders and nonresponders assessed by CEA was 28 months and 13 months, respectively. These data suggest that measurement of CEA levels might be helpful in monitoring chemotherapeutic response when imaging study is unsuitable for assessing the response in clinical practice. Furthermore, measurement of CEA levels may be helpful in determining the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11355325     DOI: 10.1007/s003840000266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Plasma von Willebrand factor level as a prognostic indicator of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Shu Wang; Jen-Kou Lin; Tzu-Chen Lin; Tzeon-Jye Chiou; Jin-Hwang Liu; Chueh-Chuan Yen; Po-Min Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Carcinoembryonic antigen reduction after medical treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Antonio Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Threshold Change in CEA as a Predictor of Non-Progression to First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Elevated CEA.

Authors:  Pat Gulhati; Jun Yin; Levi Pederson; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Paulo Hoff; Jean-Yves Douillard; J Randolph Hecht; Christophe Tournigand; Niall Tebbut; Benoist Chibaudel; Aimery De Gramont; Qian Shi; Michael James Overman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Bevacizumab Pharmacokinetics Influence Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Morgane Caulet; Thierry Lecomte; Olivier Bouché; Jérôme Rollin; Valérie Gouilleux-Gruart; Nicolas Azzopardi; Julie Léger; Christophe Borg; Jean-Yves Douillard; Sylvain Manfredi; Denis Smith; Olivier Capitain; Aurélie Ferru; Driffa Moussata; Eric Terrebone; Gilles Paintaud; David Ternant
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The dynamic monitoring of CEA in response to chemotherapy and prognosis of mCRC patients.

Authors:  Ping Yu; Mingyi Zhou; Jinglei Qu; Lingyu Fu; Xuedan Li; Ruimei Cai; Bo Jin; Yuee Teng; Jing Liu; Jing Shi; Jingdong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Circulating Cell Free DNA Integrity Index as a Biomarker for Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nancy Samir Eskander; Lamia Mansour; Amaal Abdelaal; Ehab Saad; Doaa Mohamed
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-01-01

7.  Tumor marker evolution: comparison with imaging for assessment of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Robbert J de Haas; Dennis A Wicherts; Eduardo Flores; Michel Ducreux; Francis Lévi; Bernard Paule; Daniel Azoulay; Denis Castaing; Antoinette Lemoine; René Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen for monitoring tumor progression during palliative chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gangmi Kim; Eun-Joo Jung; Chun-Geun Ryu; Dae-Yong Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  The role of tissue and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in stages I to III of colorectal cancer-A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Guojun Tong; Wei Xu; Guiyang Zhang; Jian Liu; Zhaozheng Zheng; Yan Chen; Pingping Niu; Xuting Xu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.