OBJECTIVE: The treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm accompanied by ischemic heart disease presents a surgical challenge and has up to now shown a high hospital mortality rate. This report discusses the factors contributing to improved results in these cases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the records of 24 consecutive patients who had undergone replacement of thoracic aorta with combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between May 1991 and October 1998. Fifteen patients received total arch replacement (Arch-with-CABG Group), and the other 9 patients received the Bentall operation (Bentall-with-CABG Group). These results were compared with those patients who had undergone replacement of the thoracic aorta without CABG (Without-CABG Group). RESULTS: In the combined CABG groups, the overall operative mortality rate was 16.7%. In comparison with the Arch-without-CABG Group, there was a significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and longer selective cerebral perfusion time in the Arch-with-CABG Group. However, no significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in either actuarial survival or the cardiac-event-free rate at 5 years between the replacement of thoracic aorta with- and without-CABG Groups (83.1% vs. 90.4%, and 78.5% vs. 77.7%, respectively). No reoperation and no late death were observed during the follow-up period (mean 21.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that replacement of the thoracic aorta combined with CABG can be carried out safely, and that revascularization for coronary artery disease is useful for preventing any occurrence of cardiac event.
OBJECTIVE: The treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm accompanied by ischemic heart disease presents a surgical challenge and has up to now shown a high hospital mortality rate. This report discusses the factors contributing to improved results in these cases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the records of 24 consecutive patients who had undergone replacement of thoracic aorta with combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between May 1991 and October 1998. Fifteen patients received total arch replacement (Arch-with-CABG Group), and the other 9 patients received the Bentall operation (Bentall-with-CABG Group). These results were compared with those patients who had undergone replacement of the thoracic aorta without CABG (Without-CABG Group). RESULTS: In the combined CABG groups, the overall operative mortality rate was 16.7%. In comparison with the Arch-without-CABG Group, there was a significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and longer selective cerebral perfusion time in the Arch-with-CABG Group. However, no significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in either actuarial survival or the cardiac-event-free rate at 5 years between the replacement of thoracic aorta with- and without-CABG Groups (83.1% vs. 90.4%, and 78.5% vs. 77.7%, respectively). No reoperation and no late death were observed during the follow-up period (mean 21.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that replacement of the thoracic aorta combined with CABG can be carried out safely, and that revascularization for coronary artery disease is useful for preventing any occurrence of cardiac event.