OBJECTIVE: To investigate the respective contribution of endogenous and exogenous transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the colonization of lungs in the mechanically ventilated patient, to estimate the role of P. aeruginosa colonization in the occurrence of severe infections, and to extrapolate appropriate control measures for the prevention of P. aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective study of the presence of P. aeruginosa (in stomach fluid, throat specimens, stool, and sputum) on admission, twice a week throughout the patient's stay, and in their environment. O-serotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and arbitrarily-primed polymerase chain reaction were used to characterize the strains. SETTING: The two intensive care units (ICUs 1 and 2) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: During a 6-month period, 59 patients were included (21 in ICU 1 and 38 in ICU 2). RESULTS: P. aeruginosa was isolated in 26 patients, including ten pneumonia cases and seven colonizations on admission. The incidence of acquired colonization was statistically different between the two ICUs: 5.5 and 20.5 per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation, in ICUs 1 and 2, respectively. Endogenous acquisition was the main origin of P. aeruginosa colonization (21 of 26 patients) and the upper respiratory tract was the main bacterial reservoir in broncho-pulmonary colonization and infection. However, during the 6-month period of the study, a multidrug-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa O:11, isolated in the sink of the room of 12 patients, was found responsible for two colonizations (1 digestive, 1 throat/lungs) and one pneumonia. As a whole, from 26 cases of colonization/infection with P. aeruginosa, 5 were related to an exogenous contamination (environmental reservoir in 4 patients and cross-contamination in one patient). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the need for applying various infection control measures to prevent colonization of patients with P. aeruginosa, including strategies to limit the potential of sinks from acting as a source or reservoir for this bacterium.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the respective contribution of endogenous and exogenous transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the colonization of lungs in the mechanically ventilated patient, to estimate the role of P. aeruginosa colonization in the occurrence of severe infections, and to extrapolate appropriate control measures for the prevention of P. aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective study of the presence of P. aeruginosa (in stomach fluid, throat specimens, stool, and sputum) on admission, twice a week throughout the patient's stay, and in their environment. O-serotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and arbitrarily-primed polymerase chain reaction were used to characterize the strains. SETTING: The two intensive care units (ICUs 1 and 2) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: During a 6-month period, 59 patients were included (21 in ICU 1 and 38 in ICU 2). RESULTS:P. aeruginosa was isolated in 26 patients, including ten pneumonia cases and seven colonizations on admission. The incidence of acquired colonization was statistically different between the two ICUs: 5.5 and 20.5 per 1000 days of mechanical ventilation, in ICUs 1 and 2, respectively. Endogenous acquisition was the main origin of P. aeruginosa colonization (21 of 26 patients) and the upper respiratory tract was the main bacterial reservoir in broncho-pulmonary colonization and infection. However, during the 6-month period of the study, a multidrug-resistant strain of P. aeruginosa O:11, isolated in the sink of the room of 12 patients, was found responsible for two colonizations (1 digestive, 1 throat/lungs) and one pneumonia. As a whole, from 26 cases of colonization/infection with P. aeruginosa, 5 were related to an exogenous contamination (environmental reservoir in 4 patients and cross-contamination in one patient). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the need for applying various infection control measures to prevent colonization of patients with P. aeruginosa, including strategies to limit the potential of sinks from acting as a source or reservoir for this bacterium.
Authors: F Naze; E Jouen; R T Randriamahazo; C Simac; P Laurent; A Blériot; F Chiroleu; L Gagnevin; O Pruvost; A Michault Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Anne F Voor In 't Holt; Juliëtte A Severin; Emmanuel M E H Lesaffre; Margreet C Vos Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: J Kristie Johnson; Gwen Smith; Mary S Lee; Richard A Venezia; O Colin Stine; James P Nataro; William Hsiao; Anthony D Harris Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Nhu T Q Nguyen; Emmanuelle Gras; Nguyen D Tran; Nhi N Y Nguyen; Hanh T H Lam; William J Weiss; Thien N M Doan; Binh An Diep Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mahmoud Y Alkawareek; Qais Th Algwari; Garry Laverty; Sean P Gorman; William G Graham; Deborah O'Connell; Brendan F Gilmore Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240