Literature DB >> 11354747

MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum: qualitative and quantitative assessment.

M Zanetti1, T Carstensen, D Weishaupt, B Jost, J Hodler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess qualitatively and quantitatively the MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum. Form and signal abnormalities of arthroscopically normal labral parts were analyzed on axial and coronal MR arthrograms of 55 consecutive patients (mean age 43.8 years, age range 21-76 years) referred mainly for suspected rotator cuff lesions. Length and width of the labrum were measured. One hundred twenty-one of 241 (50%) arthroscopically normal labral parts demonstrated normal (low) signal intensity and normal form on MR arthrograms. Increased linear or globular signal intensity was present in 74 of 241 (31%) normal labral parts, deformed or fragmented labra in 28 (12%), complete separation of the labrum from the glenoid in 4 (2%), a cleft in 5 (2%), attenuation in 4 (2%), and complete absence in 5 (2%), respectively. The mean size of the normal labrum varied between 3.8 x 3.3 mm at the subscapularis bursa level (anteriorly) and 6.1 x 5.6 mm at the inferior portion of the glenoid (anteriorly). The size was not significantly different between arthroscopically normal and abnormal labral parts (p = 0.13-0.83). Since the MR appearance of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum varies considerably concerning signal intensity, form, and size, only major tears or detachments of the labrum should be diagnosed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11354747     DOI: 10.1007/s003300000679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  9 in total

1.  Comments on Zanetti et al.: MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum: qualitative and quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Direct magnetic resonance arthrography.

Authors:  Dmitry Elentuck; William E Palmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [MR imaging of the shoulder. Impingement and instability-related abnormalities].

Authors:  M Zanetti; N Saupe
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  [Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: impingement and instability related abnormalities--update 2013].

Authors:  M Zanetti; N Mamisch-Saupe
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography.

Authors:  Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Marco Zanetti; Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The anterior glenohumeral joint capsule: macroscopic and MRI anatomy of the fasciculus obliquus or so-called ligamentum glenohumerale spirale.

Authors:  M Merila; T Leibecke; H-B Gehl; L-C Busch; M Russlies; A Eller; T Haviko; I Kolts
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The primer for sports medicine professionals on imaging: the shoulder.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Sapna Jain Palrecha; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 8.  MR imaging in sports-related glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  Klaus Woertler; Simone Waldt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  What can the Radiologist do to Help the Surgeon Manage Shoulder Instability?

Authors:  Nicole Pouliart; Seema Doering; Maryam Shahabpour
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.