Literature DB >> 11354583

Relatives' reports of long term problems following traumatic brain injury or subarachnoid haemorrhage.

D J Hellawell1, B Pentland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and compare the late outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in terms of the carers' perspectives, and their symptoms' profiles.
METHOD: Postal survey to surviving patients who had been discharged from a Regional Neurosurgical Unit five to seven years previously. There were 288 patients identified retrospectively from hospital records, of whom 209 (126 TBI and 83 SAH) were alive and traced at follow-up. The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the Relative's Questionnaire (RQ) were used.
RESULTS: Relative's questionnaires were returned by 128 patients; 70 TBI and 58 SAH, giving response rates of 56% and 70% respectively. In terms of outcome, there was a high degree of similarity between groups. On the GOS, approximately half of each group were classified as moderately disabled (49% and 48% of the TBI and SAH groups respectively); a quarter remained severely disabled (27% and 22%); and the remaining quarter were adjudged to have made a good recovery (24% and 29%). There was a considerable overlap in terms of the most commonly reported symptoms. Cognitive and physical problems tended to be more commonly reported by relatives of the TBI patients, whilst emotional and subjective symptoms were reported equally in both patient groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of TBI and SAH persist for many years post-injury, leading to considerable disability and increased dependency. Although the demographic details and mechanisms of injury in these two patient groups differ, there is a high degree of similarity in the pattern of sequelae reported by carers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11354583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hypopituitarism following brain injury: when does it occur and how best to test?

Authors:  Valentina Gasco; Flavia Prodam; Loredana Pagano; Silvia Grottoli; Sara Belcastro; Paolo Marzullo; Guglielmo Beccuti; Ezio Ghigo; Gianluca Aimaretti
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Hypopituitarism following traumatic brain injury: determining factors for diagnosis.

Authors:  Eva Fernandez-Rodriguez; Ignacio Bernabeu; Ana Isabel Castro; Fahrettin Kelestimur; Felipe F Casanueva
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Post-traumatic hypopituitarism: report of a child case.

Authors:  Makoto Aoki; Shuichi Hagiwara; Masato Murata; Minoru Kaneko; Masahiko Kanbe; Jun Nakajima; Yusuke Sawada; Yoshio Ohyama; Jun'ichi Tamura; Kiyohiro Oshima
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2016-05-16

Review 4.  Hypopituitarism After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sanjiv Gray; Tracy Bilski; Beatrice Dieudonne; Saqib Saeed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.