Literature DB >> 11354523

Very short (15s-15s) interval-training around the critical velocity allows middle-aged runners to maintain VO2 max for 14 minutes.

V L Billat1, J Slawinksi, V Bocquet, P Chassaing, A Demarle, J P Koralsztein.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three very short interval training sessions (15-15 s of hard and easier runs) run at an average velocity equal to the critical velocity to elicit VO2 max for more than 10 minutes. We hypothesized that the interval with the smallest amplitude (defined as the ratio between the difference in velocity between the hard and the easy run divided by the average velocity and multiplied by 100) would be the most efficient to elicit VO2 max for the longer time. The subjects were middle-aged runners (52 +/- 5 yr, VO2 max of 52.1 +/- 6 mL x min(-1) x kg(-1), vVO2 max of 15.9 +/- 1.8 km x h(-1), critical velocity of 85.6 +/- 1.2% vVO2 max) who were used to long slow distance-training rather than interval training. They performed three interval-training (IT) sessions on a synthetic track (400 m) whilst breathing through the COSMED K4b2 portable metabolic analyser. These three IT sessions were: A) 90-80% vVO2 max (for hard bouts and active recovery periods, respectively), the amplitude= (90-80/85) 100=11%, B) 100-70% vVO2 max amplitude=35%, and C) 60 x 110% vVO2 max amplitude = 59%. Interval training A and B allowed the athlete to spend twice the time at VO2 max (14 min vs. 7 min) compared to interval training C. Moreover, at the end of interval training A and B the runners had a lower blood lactate than after the procedure C (9 vs. 11 mmol x l(-1)). In conclusion, short interval-training of 15s-15s at 90-80 and 100-70% of vVO2 max proved to be the most efficient in stimulating the oxygen consumption to its highest level in healthy middle-aged long-distance runners used to doing only long slow distance-training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11354523     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  26 in total

Review 1.  Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice. Special recommendations for middle- and long-distance running. Part II: anaerobic interval training.

Authors:  L V Billat
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Performance for short intermittent runs: active recovery vs. passive recovery.

Authors:  Grégory Dupont; Nicolas Blondel; Serge Berthoin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Optimising high-intensity treadmill training using the running speed at maximal O(2) uptake and the time for which this can be maintained.

Authors:  Timothy P Smith; Jeff S Coombes; Dominic P Geraghty
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of active recovery between series on performance during an intermittent exercise model in young endurance athletes.

Authors:  Magaly Tardieu-Berger; Delphine Thevenet; Hassane Zouhal; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Training to enhance the physiological determinants of long-distance running performance: can valid recommendations be given to runners and coaches based on current scientific knowledge?

Authors:  Adrian W Midgley; Lars R McNaughton; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Physiological aspects of soccer refereeing performance and training.

Authors:  Carlo Castagna; Grant Abt; Stefano D'Ottavio
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Influence of exercise intensity on time spent at high percentage of maximal oxygen uptake during an intermittent session in young endurance-trained athletes.

Authors:  Delphine Thevenet; Magaly Tardieu; Hassane Zouhal; Christophe Jacob; Ben Abderraouf Abderrahman; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  A mathematical model for quantifying training.

Authors:  Philip R Hayes; Mike D Quinn
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Effects of recovery mode (active vs. passive) on performance during a short high-intensity interval training program: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman; Hassane Zouhal; Karim Chamari; Delphine Thevenet; Pierre-Yves de Mullenheim; Steven Gastinger; Zouhair Tabka; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.