OBJECTIVE: To find out whether pilonidal sinus is more common among obese people. DESIGN: Retrospective study from hospital records. SETTING: Two university hospitals, Turkey. SUBJECTS: 419 patients who were operated on for pilonidal sinus disease; and 213 age and sex matched patients with benign diseases other than pilonidal sinus disease and who were not morbidly obese acted as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of body mass index (BMI) in the two groups. RESULTS: Patients with BMI of 25-30 were classified as overweight (61/419, 15% compared with 28/213, 13%), and those with BMI of 30 or more as obese (7/419 compared with 4/213, 2% in each group). Mean (SD) BMI of patients with pilonidal sinus disease was 26.0 (3.9) compared with 25.6 (3.9) in the control group (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Obesity alone is not an important factor in the aetiology of pilonidal sinus disease.
OBJECTIVE: To find out whether pilonidal sinus is more common among obesepeople. DESIGN: Retrospective study from hospital records. SETTING: Two university hospitals, Turkey. SUBJECTS: 419 patients who were operated on for pilonidal sinus disease; and 213 age and sex matched patients with benign diseases other than pilonidal sinus disease and who were not morbidly obese acted as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of body mass index (BMI) in the two groups. RESULTS:Patients with BMI of 25-30 were classified as overweight (61/419, 15% compared with 28/213, 13%), and those with BMI of 30 or more as obese (7/419 compared with 4/213, 2% in each group). Mean (SD) BMI of patients with pilonidal sinus disease was 26.0 (3.9) compared with 25.6 (3.9) in the control group (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION:Obesity alone is not an important factor in the aetiology of pilonidal sinus disease.
Authors: Heidi Sievert; Theo Evers; Edouard Matevossian; Christian Hoenemann; Sebastian Hoffmann; Dietrich Doll Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Dietrich Doll; Markus M Luedi; Theo Evers; Peter Kauf; Edouard Matevossian Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.571