Literature DB >> 11353762

Identification of multiple constitutive and inducible hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes in market weight swine.

M J Myers1, D E Farrell, K D Howard, J C Kawalek.   

Abstract

Constitutive swine enzymes analogous to human/rat cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 1A2, 2A6, 2B1/2/6, 2D6, 2E1, 3A1, and 4A1/3 were detected by Western blot analysis. Swine 2E1 has a molecular weight greater than rat 2E1; swine 2B2 has a molecular weight similar to human 2B6. An induction cocktail containing beta-naphthoflavone, phenobarbital, and dexamethasone induced immunoreactive homologs of 1A1, 1A2, 2B1, 2B2, 3A1, and 3A2. Although the P450 content was increased by induction, there was no difference in the Soret lambda(max). Swine 1A1 has a lower molecular weight than swine 1A2 and rat 1A1. A swine 2B1 homolog was seen after induction, with a molecular weight that was lower than rat 2B1 but higher than swine 2B2. Induction did not augment swine 2B2 levels. The 3A homologs have molecular weights similar to their rodent counterparts. Following induction, swine 3A1 levels increased and were accompanied by the appearance of swine 3A2. Induction had no effect on expression of 2A6, 2B6, 2D6, 2E1, or 4A1/3. Enzyme induction increased the specific activities (nmol/min/mg) of substrates specific for 1A (7 of 7 substrates tested), 2A (2/2), 2B (5/5), 2C (1/3), 2D (3/4), 2E (3/3), 3A (3/5), and 4A (1/1). Although the specific activities of the 2E substrates increased, the turnover number for hydroxylation of chlorzoxazone was unchanged and that of p-nitrophenol and aniline were depressed in induced pigs. These results show that swine CYP isoforms are similar to those identified in human and rodents, but they are also different in many ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11353762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  6 in total

Review 1.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of the minipig: data compilation and model implementation.

Authors:  Claudia Suenderhauf; Neil Parrott
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Analysis of substrate specificity of pig CYP2B22 and CYP2C49 towards herbicides by transgenic rice plants.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kawahigashi; Sakiko Hirose; Kenjirou Ozawa; Yoshiko Ido; Misaki Kojima; Hideo Ohkawa; Yasunobu Ohkawa
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Engineered Swine Models of Cancer.

Authors:  Adrienne L Watson; Daniel F Carlson; David A Largaespada; Perry B Hackett; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  The Oncopig Cancer Model: An Innovative Large Animal Translational Oncology Platform.

Authors:  Kyle M Schachtschneider; Regina M Schwind; Jordan Newson; Nickolas Kinachtchouk; Mark Rizko; Nasya Mendoza-Elias; Paul Grippo; Daniel R Principe; Alex Park; Nana H Overgaard; Gregers Jungersen; Kelly D Garcia; Ajay V Maker; Laurie A Rund; Howard Ozer; Ron C Gaba; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Effects of ergot alkaloids on liver function of piglets as evaluated by the (13)C-methacetin and (13)C-α-ketoisocaproic acid breath test.

Authors:  Sven Dänicke; Sonja Diers
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 6.  Genetically Engineered Pigs to Study Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Kalla; Alexander Kind; Angelika Schnieke
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.