Literature DB >> 11352997

Characterization of tactile afferent fibers in the hand of the marmoset monkey.

G T Coleman1, H Bahramali, H Q Zhang, M J Rowe.   

Abstract

The marmoset monkey, Callithrix jacchus, has increasingly been the subject of experiments for the analysis of somatosensory system function in simian primates. However, as response properties of the mechanoreceptive afferent fibers supplying the skin have not been characterized for this primate, the present study was undertaken to classify fibers innervating the glabrous skin of the marmoset hand and determine whether they resembled those described for other mammalian species, including cat, macaque monkey, and human subjects. Forty-seven tactile afferent fibers with receptive fields (RFs) on the glabrous skin of the hand were isolated in fine median and ulnar nerve strands. Controlled tactile stimuli, including static indentation and skin vibration, were used to classify fibers. Twenty-six (55%) responded to static indentation in a sustained manner and were designated slowly adapting (SA) fibers, while 21 (45%) were selectively sensitive to the dynamic components of the stimulus. The SA fibers had well-defined boundaries to their RFs, lacked spontaneous activity in most cases (23/26 fibers), had an irregular pattern of discharge to static skin indentation, and displayed graded response levels as a function of indentation amplitude, attributes that were consistent with the properties of slowly adapting type I (SAI) fibers described in other species. The dynamically sensitive afferent fibers could be subdivided into two distinct functional classes, based on their responses to vibrotactile stimulation. The majority (15/21) responded best to lower frequency vibration (~10-50 Hz) and had small RFs, whereas the second class responded preferentially to higher frequency vibration (50-700 Hz) with maximal sensitivity at ~200-300 Hz. These two classes resembled, respectively, the rapidly adapting (RA) and Pacinian corpuscle-related (PC) fiber classes found in other species, and like them, responded to vibration with tightly phase-locked patterns of response over a wide range of frequencies. The results demonstrate that the functional classes of tactile afferent fibers that supply the glabrous skin in the marmoset monkey appear to correspond with those described previously for the cat and macaque monkey, and are similar to those supplying the human hand and fingers, although the SA fibers in the human hand appear to fall into two classes, the SAI and SAII fibers. With the increasing use of the marmoset monkey as a primate model for somatosensory system studies, these data now allow tactile neurons identified at central locations, such as the cerebral cortex and thalamus, to be classified in relation to inputs from the peripheral classes identified in the present study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352997     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  The effect of high-frequency cutaneous vibration on different inputs subserving detection of joint movement.

Authors:  N S Weerakkody; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  fMRI in the awake marmoset: somatosensory-evoked responses, functional connectivity, and comparison with propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Junjie V Liu; Yoshiyuki Hirano; George C Nascimento; Bojana Stefanovic; David A Leopold; Afonso C Silva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The mechanosensory neurons of touch and their mechanisms of activation.

Authors:  Annie Handler; David D Ginty
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  A cutaneous mechanoneural interface for neuroprosthetic feedback.

Authors:  Shriya S Srinivasan; Hugh M Herr
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 29.234

5.  Cortical control of object-specific grasp relies on adjustments of both activity and effective connectivity: a common marmoset study.

Authors:  Banty Tia; Mitsuaki Takemi; Akito Kosugi; Elisa Castagnola; Alberto Ansaldo; Takafumi Nakamura; Davide Ricci; Junichi Ushiba; Luciano Fadiga; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Tactile sensitivity in the rat: a correlation between receptor structure and function.

Authors:  Lucia Guzun; Pascal Fortier-Poisson; Jean-Sébastien Langlais; Allan M Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cortical basis for skilled vocalization.

Authors:  Christina M Cerkevich; Jean-Alban Rathelot; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 8.  The sensory neurons of touch.

Authors:  Victoria E Abraira; David D Ginty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 17.173

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.