Literature DB >> 11352964

Discrepancies in clinical laboratory testing of eligibility for trastuzumab therapy: apparent immunohistochemical false-positives do not get the message.

R R Tubbs1, J D Pettay, P C Roche, M H Stoler, R B Jenkins, T M Grogan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported what seem to be false-positive results using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA) to profile Her-2/neu amplification and overproduction in breast carcinoma. False-positive status has been based on comparisons with gene copy enumeration by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and with comparisons to immunohistochemistry (IMH) results using a monoclonal antibody. However, simple overexpression by tumor cells that have normal gene copy has not been evaluated by profiling mRNA expression, ie, such cases could simply represent true-positive, transcriptionally upregulated overexpression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred infiltrating ductal carcinomas of breast were evaluated by IMH using monoclonal (CB11; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and polyclonal (HercepTest; Dako) antibodies after antigen retrieval (AR). A polyclonal antibody sans AR (PCA/SAR) was also used. All IMH stains were evaluated and scored according to the guidelines for the FDA-approved HercepTest. A total of 145 of 400 carcinomas were subsequently evaluated by direct and digoxigenin-labeled (Dig) FISH, and 144 of 400 were evaluated by detection of mRNA overexpression via autoradiographic RNA:RNA in situ hybridization.
RESULTS: Overall HercepTest/CB11 IMH discordance was 12%. Expression of mRNA was highly concordant with FISH and DigFISH amplification and with CB11 and PCA/SAR immunohistology. IMH false-positive cases (no Her-2/neu gene amplification) occurred with both HercepTest (23%) and CB11 (17%), and the majority of false-positive results (34 of 44) were scored as 2+. All 2+ false-positive cases were mRNA-negative. Combined results of HercepTest and CB11 showed that 79% (38 of 48) of 3+ cases were Her-2/neu gene amplified, but only 17% (seven of 41) of 2+ cases had increased gene copy.
CONCLUSION: Discordant HercepTest/FISH results, and to a lesser extent discordance with CB11 IMH, are most commonly false-positive results with a score of 2+. The 2+ score as defined in the guidelines for the FDA-approved HercepTest should not be used as a criterion for trastuzumab therapy unless confirmed by FISH. Determination of Her-2 gene copy number by FISH may be a more accurate and reliable method for selecting patients eligible for trastuzumab therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11352964     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

1.  Gold-facilitated in situ hybridization: a bright-field autometallographic alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of Her-2/neu gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Mark Stoler; Patrick Roche; James Hainfeld
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Novel bright field molecular morphology methods for detection of HER2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; David Hicks; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Tom Grogan; James Hainfeld
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

4.  HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques.

Authors:  C M Ellis; M J Dyson; T J Stephenson; E L Maltby
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

6.  Her-2/neu gene amplification compared with HER-2/neu protein overexpression on ultrasound guided core-needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H Kaya; T Ragazzini; E Aribal; I Güney; E Kotiloglu
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Gene amplification and protein expression of EGFR and HER2 by chromogenic in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  H Awaya; Y Takeshima; O Furonaka; N Kohno; K Inai
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Status of HER1 and HER2 in peritoneal, ovarian and colorectal endometriosis and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  C Uzan; E Darai; A Valent; O Graesslin; A Cortez; R Rouzier; P Vielh
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Samuel Leung; Dmitry Turbin; Kelli Montgomery; Blake Gilks; Rob West; Melinda Carrier; David Huntsman; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assessment for Her-2 status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Weiguo Sui; Minglin Ou; Jiejing Chen; Youhua Wan; Hongbo Peng; Minfang Qi; He Huang; Yong Dai
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.