PURPOSE: This phase II study evaluated weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy in women with HER2-normal and HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Efficacy was correlated with immunohistochemical and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had bidimensionally measurable metastatic breast cancer. Up to three prior chemotherapy regimens, including prior anthracycline and taxane therapy, were allowed. Trastuzumab 4 mg/kg and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 were administered on week 1, with trastuzumab 2 mg/kg and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 administered on subsequent weeks. HER2 status was evaluated using four different immunohistochemical assays and FISH. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 25 weekly infusions (range, one to 85 infusions). Median delivered paclitaxel dose-intensity was 82 mg/m2/wk (range, 52 to 90 mg/m2/wk). The intent-to-treat response rate for all 95 patients enrolled was 56.8% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 67%). A response rate of 61.4% (4.5% complete response, 56.8% partial response) was observed in 88 fully assessable patients. In patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors, overall response rates ranged from 67% to 81% compared with 41% to 46% in patients with HER2-normal expression (ranges reflect the different assay methods used to assess HER2 status). Differences in response rates between patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors and those with normal HER2 expression were statistically significant for all assay methods, with CB11 and TAB250 antibodies and FISH having the strongest significance. Therapy was generally well tolerated, although three patients had serious cardiac complications. CONCLUSION: Weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy is active in women with metastatic breast cancer. Therapy was relatively well tolerated; however, attention to cardiac function is necessary.
PURPOSE: This phase II study evaluated weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy in women with HER2-normal and HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Efficacy was correlated with immunohistochemical and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had bidimensionally measurable metastatic breast cancer. Up to three prior chemotherapy regimens, including prior anthracycline and taxane therapy, were allowed. Trastuzumab 4 mg/kg and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 were administered on week 1, with trastuzumab 2 mg/kg and paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 administered on subsequent weeks. HER2 status was evaluated using four different immunohistochemical assays and FISH. RESULTS:Patients received a median of 25 weekly infusions (range, one to 85 infusions). Median delivered paclitaxel dose-intensity was 82 mg/m2/wk (range, 52 to 90 mg/m2/wk). The intent-to-treat response rate for all 95 patients enrolled was 56.8% (95% confidence interval, 47% to 67%). A response rate of 61.4% (4.5% complete response, 56.8% partial response) was observed in 88 fully assessable patients. In patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors, overall response rates ranged from 67% to 81% compared with 41% to 46% in patients with HER2-normal expression (ranges reflect the different assay methods used to assess HER2 status). Differences in response rates between patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors and those with normal HER2 expression were statistically significant for all assay methods, with CB11 and TAB250 antibodies and FISH having the strongest significance. Therapy was generally well tolerated, although three patients had serious cardiac complications. CONCLUSION: Weekly trastuzumab and paclitaxel therapy is active in women with metastatic breast cancer. Therapy was relatively well tolerated; however, attention to cardiac function is necessary.
Authors: Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Mark Stoler; Patrick Roche; James Hainfeld Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Eduardo Sanabria-Figueroa; Siobhan M Donnelly; Kevin C Foy; Meghan C Buss; Robert C Castellino; Elisavet Paplomata; Latonia Taliaferro-Smith; Pravin T P Kaumaya; Rita Nahta Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2014-11-12 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Javier Puente Vázquez; Sara López-Tarruella Cobo; José A García-Sáenz; Antonio Casado Herráez; Fernando Moreno Antón; Teresa Sampedro Gimeno; Coralia Bueno Muiño; Enrique Grande Pulido; Miguel Martín Jiménez; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Eun-Jung Jung; Libero Santarpia; Juyeon Kim; Francisco J Esteva; Erica Moretti; Aman U Buzdar; Angelo Di Leo; Xiao-Feng Le; Robert C Bast; Soon-Tae Park; Lajos Pusztai; George A Calin Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Smitha Reddy; Calvin C Shaller; Mohan Doss; Irina Shchaveleva; James D Marks; Jian Q Yu; Matthew K Robinson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chau T Dang; Anthony F Yu; Lee W Jones; Jennifer Liu; Richard M Steingart; Daniel F Argolo; Larry Norton; Clifford A Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; David Hicks; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Tom Grogan; James Hainfeld Journal: J Mol Histol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.611